JQUA vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. JQUA is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JQUA returned 13.27%/yr vs -2.14%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JQUA charges 0.12%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

JQUA vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 10.93% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -1.61% return.

JQUA

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 3.22%
• YTD: 10.93%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 19.51%
• 3Y*: 19.44%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: -1.61%
• 6M: -2.62%
• 1Y: -3.40%
• 3Y*: -1.43%
• 5Y*: -2.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	10.93%	11.69%	21.21%	25.13%	-13.45%	28.68%	16.56%	28.47%	-2.98%	5.07%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-1.61%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	4.07%	6.03%	4.64%	2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and CCOR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017	0.25

The correlation between JQUA and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JQUA vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JQUA	CCOR
Technology	41.9%	16.2%
Financial Services	10.2%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.2%	9.4%
Industrials	7.6%	9.2%
Healthcare	7.2%	10.8%
Communication Services	5.5%	8.7%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	6.8%
Energy	3.2%	7.2%
Utilities	2.3%	6.3%
Real Estate	2.1%	2.8%
Basic Materials	0.8%	5.1%

Return for Risk

JQUA vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA

JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 54
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 48
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JQUA	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	-0.48	+2.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.38	-0.63	+3.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.93	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.75	-0.39	+3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.52	-0.89	+12.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JQUA vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JQUA	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	-0.48	+2.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	-0.19	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.14	+0.67

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	JQUA	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.92%	-22.99%	-9.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.13%	-8.75%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.81%	-12.31%	-4.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.47%	-22.99%	+0.52%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.09%	-18.28%	+15.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.16%	-7.30%	+3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	3.82%	-2.12%

Volatility

JQUA vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 4.19% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.43%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JQUA	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.19%	2.43%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.82%	5.19%	+3.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.57%	7.10%	+4.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.66%	11.11%	+4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.01%	10.75%	+7.26%

JQUA vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

JQUA vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, which matches CCOR's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.09%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF	1.10%	1.19%	1.24%	1.21%	1.60%	1.32%	1.44%	1.67%	2.10%	0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JQUA and CCOR in my portfolio?

JQUA and CCOR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JQUA or CCOR?

JQUA has higher volatility (4.19%) compared to CCOR (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, JQUA or CCOR?

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 13.27% vs -2.14% for CCOR. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JQUA or CCOR?

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 13.27% return vs -2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JQUA or CCOR?

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JQUA or CCOR?

JQUA and CCOR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.10%.

What is the main difference between JQUA and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.