PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JQUA vs. QUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JQUA vs. QUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JQUA achieves a 14.47% return, which is significantly higher than QUS's 7.13% return.


JQUA

1D
0.42%
1M
8.40%
YTD
14.47%
6M
15.23%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*

QUS

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.61%
YTD
7.13%
6M
7.86%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
13.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JQUA vs. QUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
14.47%11.69%21.21%25.13%-13.45%28.68%16.56%28.47%-2.98%5.07%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
7.13%14.13%18.99%21.78%-14.15%26.72%12.40%32.45%-3.66%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JQUA and QUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2017

0.91

The correlation between JQUA and QUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

JQUA vs. QUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JQUA
QUS

Technology

41.9%
26.3%

Financial Services

10.2%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
5.8%

Industrials

7.6%
8.6%

Healthcare

7.2%
13.4%

Communication Services

5.5%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
9.2%

Energy

3.2%
4.6%

Utilities

2.3%
3.6%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.4%

Basic Materials

0.8%
2.3%

Technology

JQUA
41.9%
QUS
26.3%

Financial Services

JQUA
10.2%
QUS
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JQUA
9.2%
QUS
5.8%

Industrials

JQUA
7.6%
QUS
8.6%

Healthcare

JQUA
7.2%
QUS
13.4%

Communication Services

JQUA
5.5%
QUS
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

JQUA
5.3%
QUS
9.2%

Energy

JQUA
3.2%
QUS
4.6%

Utilities

JQUA
2.3%
QUS
3.6%

Real Estate

JQUA
2.1%
QUS
1.4%

Basic Materials

JQUA
0.8%
QUS
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JQUA vs. QUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

QUS
QUS Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
QUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JQUA vs. QUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) and SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JQUAQUSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.13

2.06

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.04

2.94

+0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

2.77

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.27

12.37

+1.90

JQUA vs. QUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JQUA Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the QUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JQUA and QUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JQUAQUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

2.06

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

0.80

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.77

+0.06

Drawdowns

JQUA vs. QUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JQUA drawdown since its inception was -32.92%, roughly equal to the maximum QUS drawdown of -33.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JQUA and QUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JQUAQUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-33.78%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.13%

-6.85%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.81%

-13.94%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

-22.30%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.07%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-3.70%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.53%

+0.16%

Volatility

JQUA vs. QUS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF (QUS) at 1.80%. This indicates that JQUA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JQUAQUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.80%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.33%

6.68%

+1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.21%

9.08%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

14.32%

+1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

16.42%

+1.57%

JQUA vs. QUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JQUA has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than QUS's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JQUA vs. QUS - Dividend Comparison

JQUA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than QUS's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.07%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%0.00%0.00%
QUS
SPDR MSCI USA StrategicFactors ETF
1.31%1.38%1.49%1.57%1.68%1.27%1.73%1.81%2.12%1.86%2.07%1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, JQUA and QUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JQUA has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to QUS (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JQUA dropped -32.92% vs QUS's -33.78%.

On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 14.20% vs 11.37% for QUS. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, QUS has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QUS.

QUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.31%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.

JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index, while QUS tracks MSCI USA Factor Mix A-Series Capped (USD). They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JQUA and 0.15% for QUS.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JQUA and QUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer