JOET vs. VAMO
JOET (Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. JOET is passively managed, while VAMO is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JOET returned 10.88%/yr vs 8.12%/yr for VAMO. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JOET charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.
Performance
JOET vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return.
JOET
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.74%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.88%
- 10Y*
- —
VAMO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.08%
- YTD
- 3.15%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.91%
- 5Y*
- 8.12%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
JOET vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 7.43% | 11.89% | 24.01% | 16.34% | -18.04% | 26.79% | 6.00% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 3.15% | 16.51% | 6.11% | 5.58% | 8.55% | 32.16% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between JOET and VAMO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JOET and VAMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JOET vs. VAMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JOET
VAMO
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
JOET
VAMO
Industrials
JOET
VAMO
Financial Services
JOET
VAMO
Healthcare
JOET
VAMO
Consumer Cyclical
JOET
VAMO
Energy
JOET
VAMO
Communication Services
JOET
VAMO
Basic Materials
JOET
VAMO
Real Estate
JOET
VAMO
-
Consumer Defensive
JOET
VAMO
Utilities
JOET
VAMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JOET vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank
JOET
VAMO
JOET vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JOET | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 3.28 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.19 | 9.47 | -4.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JOET | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.63 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.24 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
JOET vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and VAMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JOET | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.58% | -41.84% | +15.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.42% | -5.55% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -11.61% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.58% | -17.25% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.76% | +2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -9.98% | +2.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 1.92% | +0.79% |
Volatility
JOET vs. VAMO - Volatility Comparison
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO) at 2.97%. This indicates that JOET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VAMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JOET | VAMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 2.97% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 7.66% | +2.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.45% | 11.19% | +2.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.70% | 17.34% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 18.09% | -0.57% |
JOET vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
JOET vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison
JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than VAMO's 0.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JOET Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.71% | 1.32% | 1.25% | 0.42% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF | 0.63% | 1.41% | 0.84% | 1.35% | 1.10% | 1.07% | 1.03% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.35% | 0.56% | 0.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JOET and VAMO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JOET has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to VAMO (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs VAMO's -41.84%.
On 5-year performance, JOET leads with 10.88% vs 8.12% for VAMO. On fees, JOET is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, VAMO has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JOET has performed better with a 10.88% return vs 8.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JOET is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.
VAMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.61% for JOET.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.65% for VAMO.
VAMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JOET and VAMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer