PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JOET vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JOET vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JOET achieves a 7.43% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.


JOET

1D
0.00%
1M
5.74%
YTD
7.43%
6M
6.85%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
18.62%
5Y*
10.88%
10Y*

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JOET vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
7.43%11.89%24.01%16.34%-18.04%26.79%6.00%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%5.59%

Correlation

The correlation between JOET and ULVM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2020

0.87

The correlation between JOET and ULVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JOET vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JOET
ULVM

Technology

23.1%
13.1%

Industrials

22.6%
12.2%

Financial Services

15.1%
22.5%

Healthcare

11.1%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
5.3%

Energy

5.8%
3.4%

Communication Services

4.0%
3.5%

Basic Materials

3.2%
4.1%

Real Estate

2.4%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.6%
4.7%

Utilities

0.8%
12.6%

Technology

JOET
23.1%
ULVM
13.1%

Industrials

JOET
22.6%
ULVM
12.2%

Financial Services

JOET
15.1%
ULVM
22.5%

Healthcare

JOET
11.1%
ULVM
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JOET
10.3%
ULVM
5.3%

Energy

JOET
5.8%
ULVM
3.4%

Communication Services

JOET
4.0%
ULVM
3.5%

Basic Materials

JOET
3.2%
ULVM
4.1%

Real Estate

JOET
2.4%
ULVM
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

JOET
1.6%
ULVM
4.7%

Utilities

JOET
0.8%
ULVM
12.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JOET vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JOET
JOET Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
JOET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JOET Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
JOET Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
JOET Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
JOET Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JOET vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JOETULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.47

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

4.50

-3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.19

18.64

-13.45

JOET vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JOET Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JOET and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JOETULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

2.71

-1.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.74

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.58

+0.13

Drawdowns

JOET vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JOET drawdown since its inception was -26.58%, smaller than the maximum ULVM drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JOET and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JOETULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.58%

-40.71%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.42%

-6.47%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-18.14%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.58%

-19.77%

-6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-5.75%

-1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.71%

1.56%

+1.15%

Volatility

JOET vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF (JOET) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that JOET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JOETULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

2.96%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

7.97%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

10.74%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.70%

15.48%

+2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.52%

18.86%

-1.34%

JOET vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JOET has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

JOET vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

JOET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JOET
Virtus Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum ETF
0.61%0.65%0.71%1.32%1.25%0.42%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


JOET and ULVM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JOET has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JOET dropped -26.58% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 10.88% for JOET. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 10.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for JOET.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.61% for JOET.

JOET tracks Terranova U.S. Quality Momentum Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JOET and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JOET and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer