PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JNBAX vs. GSBFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBAX achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than GSBFX's 6.71% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX has underperformed GSBFX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while GSBFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.89% annualized return.


JNBAX

1D
1.23%
1M
-0.54%
6M
2.70%
YTD
4.72%
1Y
10.95%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
4.09%
10Y*
5.61%
ALL TIME*
4.90%

GSBFX

1D
0.70%
1M
0.16%
6M
5.01%
YTD
6.71%
1Y
12.27%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
6.89%
ALL TIME*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNBAX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A
4.72%12.74%7.22%9.20%-12.97%8.82%6.09%14.81%-4.46%11.85%
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
6.71%10.42%9.32%9.64%-9.53%10.50%9.53%19.38%-4.92%7.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBAX and GSBFX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2007

0.89

The correlation between JNBAX and GSBFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JNBAX vs. GSBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNBAX
JNBAX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
JNBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JNBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GSBFX
GSBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
GSBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
GSBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JNBAXGSBFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.38

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.86

2.67

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.09

11.57

-3.49

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the GSBFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBAX and GSBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBAX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, roughly equal to the maximum GSBFX drawdown of -37.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBAX and GSBFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JNBAXGSBFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-37.04%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-4.44%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.93%

-8.14%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.26%

-15.94%

-3.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.56%

-23.42%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

0.00%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-4.16%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.02%

+0.30%

Volatility

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund (GSBFX) at 1.50%. This indicates that JNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JNBAXGSBFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.33%

1.50%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

4.68%

+1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

5.74%

+1.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.96%

7.44%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.91%

7.96%

-0.05%

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than GSBFX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

JNBAX vs. GSBFX - Dividend Comparison

JNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than GSBFX's 5.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSBFX
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Fund
5.06%4.39%5.12%3.41%4.10%6.66%3.05%3.52%3.98%3.52%3.78%3.93%
JNBAX
JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A
4.67%5.04%5.77%4.94%4.46%8.18%3.34%4.03%4.41%3.74%4.27%4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


JNBAX and GSBFX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNBAX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to GSBFX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBAX dropped -37.41% vs GSBFX's -37.04%.

GSBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JNBAX and GSBFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer