JNBAX vs. JMSIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JNBAX (JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A) and JMSIX (JPMorgan Income Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - JNBAX is a Global Allocation fund tracking the 60% MSCI World Index (net total return) / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index, while JMSIX is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. JNBAX is passively managed, while JMSIX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX returned 5.61%/yr vs 3.76%/yr for JMSIX. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JNBAX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for JMSIX.

Performance

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JNBAX achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly higher than JMSIX's 1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX has outperformed JMSIX with an annualized return of 5.61%, while JMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.76% annualized return.

JNBAX

• 1D: 1.23%
• 1M: -0.54%
• 6M: 2.70%
• YTD: 4.72%
• 1Y: 10.95%
• 3Y*: 9.57%
• 5Y*: 4.09%
• 10Y*: 5.61%
• ALL TIME*: 4.90%

JMSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.47%
• 6M: 0.74%
• YTD: 1.12%
• 1Y: 3.79%
• 3Y*: 6.81%
• 5Y*: 2.71%
• 10Y*: 3.76%
• ALL TIME*: 2.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A	4.72%	12.74%	7.22%	9.20%	-12.97%	8.82%	6.09%	14.81%	-4.46%	11.85%
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund Class I	1.12%	7.68%	7.78%	6.14%	-8.24%	3.59%	3.07%	11.82%	1.03%	6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JNBAX and JMSIX is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.40
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014	0.46

The correlation between JNBAX and JMSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JNBAX vs. JMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JNBAX

JNBAX Risk / Return Rank: 52
JNBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
JNBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JNBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
JNBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JNBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

JMSIX

JMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 87
JMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
JMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
JMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
JMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JNBAX	JMSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.88	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.52	-1.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.49	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	2.89	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.09	11.55	-3.46

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JNBAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the JMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JNBAX and JMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JNBAX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than JMSIX's maximum drawdown of -18.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBAX and JMSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JNBAX	JMSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.41%	-18.40%	-19.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-1.62%	-4.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.93%	-2.25%	-5.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.26%	-11.39%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.56%	-18.40%	-5.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.90%	-0.59%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-2.54%	-2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.32%	0.41%	+0.91%

Volatility

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.33% compared to JPMorgan Income Fund Class I (JMSIX) at 0.53%. This indicates that JNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JNBAX	JMSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	0.53%	+1.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.51%	1.94%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.41%	2.50%	+4.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.96%	3.73%	+4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.91%	3.86%	+4.05%

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JNBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than JMSIX's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

JNBAX vs. JMSIX - Dividend Comparison

JNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than JMSIX's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JMSIX JPMorgan Income Fund Class I	5.54%	5.95%	5.78%	4.43%	4.78%	4.00%	4.95%	5.10%	5.43%	5.42%	0.46%	0.00%
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A	4.67%	5.04%	5.77%	4.94%	4.46%	8.18%	3.34%	4.03%	4.41%	3.74%	4.27%	4.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JNBAX and JMSIX in my portfolio?

JNBAX and JMSIX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JNBAX or JMSIX?

JNBAX has higher volatility (2.33%) compared to JMSIX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JNBAX dropped -37.41% vs JMSIX's -18.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.