JNBAX vs. GIMFX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX).
JNBAX is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan that tracks the performance of the 60% MSCI World Index (net total return) / 40% Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. It was launched on May 31, 2007. GIMFX is managed by GMO. It was launched on Feb 29, 2012.
Performance
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | -1.82% | 12.74% | 7.22% | 9.20% | -12.97% | 8.82% | 6.09% | 14.81% | -4.46% | 11.85% |
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund | 4.96% | 25.37% | 2.67% | 14.75% | -1.24% | 4.05% | -7.25% | 13.24% | -5.58% | 14.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JNBAX achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly lower than GIMFX's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, JNBAX has underperformed GIMFX with an annualized return of 5.48%, while GIMFX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.46% annualized return.
JNBAX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 9.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- 5.48%
GIMFX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -5.36%
- YTD
- 4.96%
- 6M
- 11.65%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 6.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JNBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than GIMFX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JNBAX vs. GIMFX — Risk / Return Rank
JNBAX
GIMFX
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) and GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JNBAX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 2.85 | -1.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | 3.70 | -1.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.57 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 3.48 | -2.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | 13.93 | -7.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JNBAX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 2.85 | -1.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 1.01 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.73 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.64 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between JNBAX and GIMFX is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Dividend Comparison
JNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.26%, more than GIMFX's 4.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNBAX JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A | 5.26% | 5.04% | 5.77% | 4.94% | 4.46% | 8.18% | 3.34% | 4.03% | 4.41% | 3.74% | 4.27% | 4.06% |
GIMFX GMO Implementation Fund | 4.07% | 4.28% | 3.39% | 5.93% | 3.59% | 3.28% | 2.25% | 3.99% | 4.59% | 2.95% | 1.98% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JNBAX drawdown since its inception was -37.41%, which is greater than GIMFX's maximum drawdown of -25.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JNBAX and GIMFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JNBAX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.41% | -25.87% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -6.79% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.26% | -14.02% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.56% | -25.87% | +2.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.74% | -5.36% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.92% | -4.33% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 1.75% | -0.39% |
Volatility
JNBAX vs. GIMFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Income Builder Fund Class A (JNBAX) is 3.18%, while GMO Implementation Fund (GIMFX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that JNBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIMFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JNBAX | GIMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.18% | 3.70% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 5.81% | -0.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.76% | 8.81% | -1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.72% | 8.46% | -0.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.83% | 8.93% | -1.10% |