PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. UCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMTG vs. UCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than UCO's 139.34% return.


JMTG

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UCO

1D
-3.93%
1M
-5.57%
YTD
139.34%
6M
124.58%
1Y
115.57%
3Y*
24.38%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
-11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. UCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and UCO is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

-0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. UCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG

UCO
UCO Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
UCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
UCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. UCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JMTG vs. UCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMTGUCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.31

-0.34

+1.65

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. UCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum UCO drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and UCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGUCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-99.95%

+97.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-50.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-67.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.72%

-99.26%

+97.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.67%

-85.49%

+84.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.34%

Volatility

JMTG vs. UCO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMTGUCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

57.26%

-53.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

59.81%

-56.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.67%

71.35%

-67.68%

JMTG vs. UCO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than UCO's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMTG vs. UCO - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, while UCO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


JMTG and UCO have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCO.

JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.00% for UCO.

JMTG is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while UCO is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.95% for UCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMTG and UCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer