PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. CMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMTG vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly higher than CMBS's 0.36% return.


JMTG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.12%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMBS

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.12%
6M
0.25%
YTD
0.36%
1Y
3.72%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
0.71%
10Y*
1.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.40%3.94%
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
0.36%2.82%

Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and CMBS is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CMBS
CMBS Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
CMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMTGCMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.18

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.53

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

3.81

+1.17

JMTG vs. CMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the CMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMTG and CMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum CMBS drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and CMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGCMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-15.87%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-2.44%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.55%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-2.94%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.98%

+0.03%

Volatility

JMTG vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) at 0.99%. This indicates that JMTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMTGCMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.99%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

2.83%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

3.65%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

5.32%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

5.76%

-2.06%

JMTG vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMTG vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, more than CMBS's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
3.60%3.45%3.31%2.97%2.65%2.46%2.83%2.74%2.70%2.50%2.29%2.31%
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
4.32%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMTG and CMBS have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMTG has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to CMBS (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMTG dropped -2.78% vs CMBS's -15.87%.

On 1-year performance, JMTG leads with 5.00% vs 3.72% for CMBS. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, CMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JMTG has performed better with a 5.00% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for CMBS.

JMTG has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.60% for CMBS.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.25% for CMBS.

JMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMTG and CMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer