PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. CMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JMTG vs. CMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JMTG vs. CMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
0.60%3.90%
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
0.07%2.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.60% return, which is significantly higher than CMBS's 0.07% return.


JMTG

1D
0.01%
1M
-1.21%
YTD
0.60%
6M
1.93%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CMBS

1D
0.20%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
0.07%
6M
1.21%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
5.31%
5Y*
1.05%
10Y*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JMTG vs. CMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CMBS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. CMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG

CMBS
CMBS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. CMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JMTG vs. CMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMTGCMBSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.65

0.44

+1.21

Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and CMBS is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

JMTG vs. CMBS - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than CMBS's 3.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMTG
JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF
3.16%2.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CMBS
iShares CMBS ETF
3.53%3.45%3.31%2.97%2.65%2.46%2.83%2.74%2.70%2.50%2.29%2.31%

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. CMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.64%, smaller than the maximum CMBS drawdown of -15.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and CMBS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGCMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.64%

-15.87%

+13.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-1.84%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.46%

-2.97%

+2.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

Volatility

JMTG vs. CMBS - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JMTGCMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.67%

3.92%

-0.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.67%

5.29%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.67%

5.77%

-2.10%