PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMTG vs. PMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMTG vs. PMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMTG achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than PMBS's 0.45% return.


JMTG

1D
-0.34%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.12%
YTD
0.40%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMBS

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.64%
6M
-0.17%
YTD
0.45%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMTG vs. PMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMTG and PMBS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025

0.91

The correlation between JMTG and PMBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMTG vs. PMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMTG
JMTG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMTG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
JMTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMTG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PMBS
PMBS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMTG vs. PMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) and PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMTGPMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.92

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.98

5.92

-0.94

JMTG vs. PMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMTG Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PMBS Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMTG and PMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMTG vs. PMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMTG drawdown since its inception was -2.78%, smaller than the maximum PMBS drawdown of -4.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMTG and PMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMTGPMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.78%

-4.35%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.78%

-2.97%

+0.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.85%

-1.99%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.75%

-1.15%

+0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.96%

+0.05%

Volatility

JMTG vs. PMBS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Mortgage-Backed Securities ETF (JMTG) is 1.22%, while PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund (PMBS) has a volatility of 1.48%. This indicates that JMTG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMTGPMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.48%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.89%

3.33%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.70%

4.20%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

4.87%

-1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.70%

4.87%

-1.17%

JMTG vs. PMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMTG has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PMBS's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMTG vs. PMBS - Dividend Comparison

JMTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than PMBS's 4.98% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, JMTG and PMBS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PMBS has higher volatility (1.48%) compared to JMTG (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMTG dropped -2.78% vs PMBS's -4.35%.

On 1-year performance, PMBS leads with 5.67% vs 5.00% for JMTG. On fees, JMTG is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JMTG has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PMBS has performed better with a 5.67% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMTG is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for PMBS.

PMBS has the higher dividend yield at 4.98%, compared with 4.32% for JMTG.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JMTG and 0.71% for PMBS.

JMTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMTG and PMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer