JMSI vs. ZMUN
JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. JMSI is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JMSI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.57% return.
JMSI
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.57%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund | 1.06% | 1.57% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.57% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between JMSI and ZMUN is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JMSI vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
JMSI
ZMUN
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JMSI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JMSI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 6.46 | -5.43 |
Drawdowns
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JMSI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.57% | -0.09% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -0.02% | -0.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.92% | -0.01% | -0.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JMSI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.91% | 0.54% | +2.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 0.54% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.73% | 0.54% | +3.19% |
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JMSI vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund | 3.65% | 3.65% | 3.66% | 1.79% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JMSI and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for JMSI and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer