JMSI vs. JPST

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JMSI is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JPST is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMSI returned 6.08% vs 4.31% for JPST. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.18% expense ratio.

Performance

JMSI vs. JPST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than JPST's 1.40% return.

JMSI

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.06%
• 6M: 1.41%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPST

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 4.31%
• 3Y*: 5.16%
• 5Y*: 3.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. JPST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	1.06%	4.40%	2.77%	2.70%
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF	1.40%	4.99%	5.58%	2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and JPST is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.39

JMSI vs. JPST - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JMSI	JPST
Technology	36.9%	1.8%
Financial Services	11.7%	22.6%
Communication Services	10.4%	5.5%
Healthcare	9.8%	1.5%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	2.5%
Industrials	7.2%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	0.7%
Energy	3.9%	0.4%
Utilities	2.4%	2.8%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.2%
Real Estate	1.8%	0.7%

Return for Risk

JMSI vs. JPST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI

JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 58
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 73
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

JPST

JPST Risk / Return Rank: 99
JPST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Omega Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
JPST Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. JPST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMSI	JPST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	8.09	-6.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	17.60	-14.51
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	3.94	-2.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	29.16	-27.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.06	144.13	-137.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMSI vs. JPST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is lower than the JPST Sharpe Ratio of 8.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and JPST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMSI	JPST	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	8.09	-6.00
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	6.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.03	3.20	-2.18

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. JPST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, which is greater than JPST's maximum drawdown of -3.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and JPST.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMSI	JPST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-3.28%	-1.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-0.15%	-2.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-0.02%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-0.08%	-0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.03%	+0.83%

Volatility

JMSI vs. JPST - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF (JPST) at 0.15%. This indicates that JMSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMSI	JPST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.96%	0.15%	+0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.20%	0.36%	+1.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91%	0.54%	+2.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.73%	0.58%	+3.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.73%	0.93%	+2.80%

JMSI vs. JPST - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JMSI and JPST have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMSI vs. JPST - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than JPST's 4.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	3.65%	3.65%	3.66%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF	4.26%	4.43%	5.16%	4.79%	1.83%	0.73%	1.43%	2.69%	2.07%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMSI and JPST in my portfolio?

JMSI and JPST have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMSI or JPST?

JMSI has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to JPST (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs JPST's -3.28%.

Which ETF is better, JMSI or JPST?

On 1-year performance, JMSI leads with 6.08% vs 4.31% for JPST. Both ETFs have the same 0.18% expense ratio. On volatility, JPST has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMSI or JPST?

Over the 1-year period, JMSI has performed better with a 6.08% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMSI or JPST?

JMSI and JPST have the same expense ratio: 0.18% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMSI or JPST?

JPST has the higher dividend yield at 4.26%, compared with 3.65% for JMSI.

What is the main difference between JMSI and JPST?

JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while JPST is Ultrashort Bond.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.09 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.