PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMUN vs. MYMK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZMUN achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly higher than MYMK's 0.97% return.


ZMUN

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.30%
YTD
1.77%
6M
1.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MYMK

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.83%
YTD
0.97%
6M
1.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZMUN and MYMK is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025

0.15

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and SPDR SSGA My2031 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum MYMK drawdown of -2.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and MYMK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMUNMYMKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-2.22%

+2.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.87%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.60%

+0.59%

Volatility

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMUNMYMKDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

1.92%

-1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

1.92%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

1.92%

-1.38%

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MYMK's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZMUN vs. MYMK - Dividend Comparison

ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than MYMK's 1.83% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZMUN and MYMK have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MYMK is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MYMK is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.83% for MYMK.

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.20% for MYMK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMUN and MYMK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer