PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZMUN vs. RJMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF (RJMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ZMUN having a 1.78% return and RJMI slightly lower at 1.76%.


ZMUN

1D
0.01%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.87%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RJMI

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.45%
YTD
1.76%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ZMUN and RJMI is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN) and RJ Eagle Municipal Income ETF (RJMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.10%, smaller than the maximum RJMI drawdown of -3.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZMUN and RJMI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZMUNRJMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-3.04%

+2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.48%

+0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.65%

+0.64%

Volatility

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZMUNRJMIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54%

3.04%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.54%

3.04%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.54%

3.04%

-2.50%

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZMUN has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than RJMI's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZMUN vs. RJMI - Dividend Comparison

ZMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than RJMI's 1.95% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


ZMUN and RJMI have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZMUN is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZMUN is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for RJMI.

ZMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.28%, compared with 1.95% for RJMI.

They also come from different issuers: F/m Investments and Carillon Tower Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ZMUN and 0.41% for RJMI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZMUN and RJMI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer