PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. GUMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JMSI vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JMSI vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 0.67% return.


JMSI

1D
0.51%
1M
-1.69%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
1.28%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUMI

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.67%
6M
1.49%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JMSI vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

GUMI
GUMI Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
GUMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUMI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
GUMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUMI Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIGUMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

2.82

-1.86

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

4.39

-3.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.62

-0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

6.88

-5.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.45

29.42

-24.97

JMSI vs. GUMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the GUMI Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and GUMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIGUMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.82

-1.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

3.32

-2.37

Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and GUMI is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

JMSI vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, more than GUMI's 2.81% yield.


Drawdowns

JMSI vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and GUMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIGUMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-0.48%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-0.48%

-2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.08%

-0.04%

-2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-0.05%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.11%

+0.83%

Volatility

JMSI vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.18%. This indicates that JMSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JMSIGUMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

0.18%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.06%

0.75%

+1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.02%

1.15%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.78%

1.01%

+2.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.78%

1.01%

+2.77%