PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSI vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 1.40% return.


JMSI

1D
0.08%
1M
1.53%
YTD
1.49%
6M
1.54%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.68%
YTD
1.40%
6M
0.46%
1Y
8.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and HELO is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2023

0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMSIHELODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.27

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.06

1.50

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.98

6.53

+0.44

JMSI vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and HELO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-10.89%

+6.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-5.76%

+2.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.17%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-1.18%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.32%

-0.44%

Volatility

JMSI vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) is 0.80%, while JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that JMSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.80%

1.79%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

5.02%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

6.38%

-3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.71%

7.97%

-4.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.71%

7.97%

-4.26%

JMSI vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMSI vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, more than HELO's 0.64% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JMSI and HELO have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HELO has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to JMSI (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs HELO's -10.89%.

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 8.59% vs 6.13% for JMSI. On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, JMSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 8.59% return vs 6.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HELO.

JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.64% for HELO.

JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HELO is Options Trading. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.50% for HELO.

JMSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSI and HELO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer