JMSI vs. CGMU

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JMSI (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund) and CGMU (Capital Group Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JMSI returned 6.11% vs 6.75% for CGMU. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JMSI charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for CGMU.

Performance

JMSI vs. CGMU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than CGMU's 1.58% return.

JMSI

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 1.25%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGMU

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 4.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. CGMU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	1.25%	4.40%	2.77%	2.70%
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	1.58%	5.19%	2.64%	3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and CGMU is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.70

The correlation between JMSI and CGMU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JMSI vs. CGMU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI

JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 59
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 74
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 45

CGMU

CGMU Risk / Return Rank: 76
CGMU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CGMU Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CGMU Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CGMU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
CGMU Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. CGMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JMSI	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	2.95	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	4.20	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.64	-0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	2.66	-0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.09	8.64	-1.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JMSI vs. CGMU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the CGMU Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and CGMU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JMSI	CGMU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.11	2.95	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	1.67	-0.63

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. CGMU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, which is greater than CGMU's maximum drawdown of -4.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and CGMU.

Drawdown Indicators

	JMSI	CGMU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-4.11%	-0.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.98%	-2.55%	-0.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.68%	-0.71%	+0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	-0.84%	-0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	0.78%	+0.08%

Volatility

JMSI vs. CGMU - Volatility Comparison

J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Capital Group Municipal Income ETF (CGMU) at 0.80%. This indicates that JMSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JMSI	CGMU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.97%	0.80%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.21%	1.73%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.92%	2.30%	+0.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.73%	3.48%	+0.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.73%	3.48%	+0.25%

JMSI vs. CGMU - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than CGMU's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JMSI vs. CGMU - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than CGMU's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CGMU Capital Group Municipal Income ETF	3.33%	3.32%	3.21%	3.08%	0.49%
JMSI J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund	3.64%	3.65%	3.66%	1.79%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JMSI and CGMU in my portfolio?

JMSI and CGMU have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JMSI or CGMU?

JMSI has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to CGMU (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs CGMU's -4.11%.

Which ETF is better, JMSI or CGMU?

On 1-year performance, CGMU leads with 6.75% vs 6.11% for JMSI. On fees, JMSI is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, CGMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JMSI or CGMU?

Over the 1-year period, CGMU has performed better with a 6.75% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JMSI or CGMU?

JMSI is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CGMU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JMSI or CGMU?

JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 3.33% for CGMU.

What is the main difference between JMSI and CGMU?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Capital Group. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.27% for CGMU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CGMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.