PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMSI vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMSI vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMSI achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.


JMSI

1D
-0.13%
1M
0.57%
YTD
1.06%
6M
1.41%
1Y
6.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JMSI vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JMSI and BBUS is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023

0.18

JMSI vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMSI
BBUS

Technology

36.9%
37.1%

Financial Services

11.7%
10.8%

Communication Services

10.4%
10.8%

Healthcare

9.8%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.4%

Industrials

7.2%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.5%

Energy

3.9%
3.2%

Utilities

2.4%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.2%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

JMSI
36.9%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

JMSI
11.7%
BBUS
10.8%

Communication Services

JMSI
10.4%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

JMSI
9.8%
BBUS
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

JMSI
9.5%
BBUS
9.4%

Industrials

JMSI
7.2%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

JMSI
4.7%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

JMSI
3.9%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

JMSI
2.4%
BBUS
2.6%

Basic Materials

JMSI
1.8%
BBUS
1.2%

Real Estate

JMSI
1.8%
BBUS
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMSI vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JMSI
JMSI Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
JMSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMSI Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JMSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMSI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JMSI vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JMSIBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.42

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

3.00

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.06

13.76

-6.69

JMSI vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMSI Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMSI and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JMSIBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.33

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.84

+0.19

Drawdowns

JMSI vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMSI drawdown since its inception was -4.57%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMSI and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMSIBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-35.35%

+30.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.98%

-9.21%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-0.74%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-5.46%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

2.00%

-1.14%

Volatility

JMSI vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund (JMSI) is 0.96%, while JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that JMSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMSIBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.88%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

8.96%

-6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.91%

11.87%

-8.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

17.03%

-13.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

19.59%

-15.86%

JMSI vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMSI has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JMSI vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

JMSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
JMSI
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Sustainable Municipal Income Etf Fund
3.65%3.65%3.66%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMSI and BBUS have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBUS has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to JMSI (0.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMSI dropped -4.57% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 1-year performance, BBUS leads with 27.47% vs 6.08% for JMSI. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, JMSI has been the lower-risk option at 0.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 27.47% return vs 6.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for JMSI.

JMSI has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

JMSI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BBUS is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for JMSI and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMSI and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer