PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JMOM vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JMOM vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JMOM achieves a 20.54% return, which is significantly higher than XMVM's 18.13% return.


JMOM

1D
1.25%
1M
-1.61%
6M
16.11%
YTD
20.54%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
25.54%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.83%

XMVM

1D
0.59%
1M
5.73%
6M
13.53%
YTD
18.13%
1Y
39.09%
3Y*
18.08%
5Y*
12.87%
10Y*
12.28%
ALL TIME*
9.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$17.82M$11.76M$9.25M
$2.19M$2.07M$1.98M

JMOM vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
20.54%18.02%28.47%22.89%-20.83%25.03%29.25%28.24%-5.25%3.36%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
18.13%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JMOM and XMVM is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JMOM and XMVM has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JMOM vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JMOM
XMVM

Technology

39.8%
5.1%

Industrials

13.3%
11.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
2.5%

Financial Services

9.2%
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
14.8%

Communication Services

6.5%
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
1.2%

Energy

3.2%
13.5%

Real Estate

2.6%
4.9%

Utilities

2.3%
8.5%

Basic Materials

1.2%
0.8%

Technology

JMOM
39.8%
XMVM
5.1%

Industrials

JMOM
13.3%
XMVM
11.7%

Healthcare

JMOM
9.5%
XMVM
2.5%

Financial Services

JMOM
9.2%
XMVM
37.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JMOM
7.7%
XMVM
14.8%

Communication Services

JMOM
6.5%
XMVM
0.9%

Consumer Defensive

JMOM
4.8%
XMVM
1.2%

Energy

JMOM
3.2%
XMVM
13.5%

Real Estate

JMOM
2.6%
XMVM
4.9%

Utilities

JMOM
2.3%
XMVM
8.5%

Basic Materials

JMOM
1.2%
XMVM
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JMOM vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JMOM
JMOM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
JMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
JMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JMOM vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JMOMXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.48

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.28

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.51

13.71

-0.20

JMOM vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JMOM and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JMOM vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JMOM drawdown since its inception was -34.31%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JMOM and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JMOMXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.31%

-62.83%

+28.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-9.18%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.51%

-24.12%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.26%

-24.12%

-4.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.22%

-0.12%

-4.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.25%

-10.19%

+3.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

2.86%

-0.70%

Volatility

JMOM vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.30%. This indicates that JMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JMOMXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

3.30%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.02%

9.25%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.54%

14.72%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.00%

21.24%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.17%

22.74%

-2.57%

JMOM vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JMOM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

JMOM vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

JMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than XMVM's 1.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMOM
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
0.75%0.86%0.75%1.21%1.39%0.64%0.85%1.11%1.38%0.29%0.00%0.00%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.78%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


JMOM and XMVM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMOM has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to XMVM (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JMOM dropped -34.31% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 13.81% vs 12.87% for XMVM. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 12.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.78%, compared with 0.75% for JMOM.

JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for JMOM and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JMOM and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer