JIRE vs. GSIE
JIRE (JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF) and GSIE (Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. JIRE is actively managed, while GSIE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JIRE returned 16.07%/yr vs 16.74%/yr for GSIE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JIRE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GSIE.
Performance
JIRE vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIRE achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly higher than GSIE's 6.51% return.
JIRE
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 7.72%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSIE
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 6.51%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- 1Y
- 19.35%
- 3Y*
- 16.74%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
JIRE vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIRE JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF | 7.72% | 31.83% | 3.15% | 20.00% | 5.73% |
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 6.51% | 32.53% | 5.23% | 16.99% | 3.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between JIRE and GSIE is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between JIRE and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JIRE vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JIRE
GSIE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JIRE
GSIE
Industrials
JIRE
GSIE
Technology
JIRE
GSIE
Healthcare
JIRE
GSIE
Consumer Cyclical
JIRE
GSIE
Consumer Defensive
JIRE
GSIE
Basic Materials
JIRE
GSIE
Utilities
JIRE
GSIE
Communication Services
JIRE
GSIE
Energy
JIRE
GSIE
Real Estate
JIRE
GSIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JIRE vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank
JIRE
GSIE
JIRE vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF (JIRE) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIRE | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 1.81 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 6.87 | -0.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIRE | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.38 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.52 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
JIRE vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIRE drawdown since its inception was -16.11%, smaller than the maximum GSIE drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIRE and GSIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIRE | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.11% | -34.63% | +18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -10.76% | -1.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.61% | -13.07% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -2.19% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -6.06% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.23% | 2.82% | +0.41% |
Volatility
JIRE vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF (JIRE) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) at 4.38%. This indicates that JIRE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JIRE | GSIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.38% | +0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 11.60% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 14.15% | +1.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 16.04% | +0.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 16.75% | -0.47% |
JIRE vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIRE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
JIRE vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison
JIRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than GSIE's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GSIE Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF | 2.52% | 2.65% | 3.11% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.40% | 1.60% | 2.80% | 2.68% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 0.13% |
JIRE JPMorgan International Research Enhanced Equity ETF | 2.78% | 2.99% | 3.03% | 2.74% | 2.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, JIRE and GSIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JIRE has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to GSIE (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIRE dropped -16.11% vs GSIE's -34.63%.
On 3-year performance, GSIE leads with 16.74% vs 16.07% for JIRE. On fees, JIRE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, GSIE has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GSIE has performed better with a 16.74% return vs 16.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JIRE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.
JIRE has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.52% for GSIE.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for JIRE and 0.25% for GSIE.
GSIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JIRE and GSIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer