JILGX vs. PALDX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX).
JILGX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017.
Performance
JILGX vs. PALDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILGX vs. PALDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | -3.50% | 4.24% | 11.94% | 16.22% | -17.44% | 14.29% | 17.61% | 22.27% | -8.28% | 1.87% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JILGX having a -3.50% return and PALDX slightly lower at -3.62%.
JILGX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -11.25%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 3.24%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILGX vs. PALDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PALDX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
JILGX vs. PALDX — Risk / Return Rank
JILGX
PALDX
JILGX vs. PALDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILGX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 1.12 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 1.65 | -1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.25 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 1.42 | -1.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | 6.83 | -7.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILGX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.12 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.67 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.71 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILGX and PALDX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILGX vs. PALDX - Dividend Comparison
JILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, less than PALDX's 5.62% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | 2.47% | 2.38% | 2.94% | 6.20% | 14.58% | 10.72% | 6.35% | 12.46% | 11.94% | 6.15% | 7.98% | 8.76% |
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JILGX vs. PALDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILGX drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than PALDX's maximum drawdown of -26.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILGX and PALDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILGX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -26.16% | -24.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -8.20% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -20.47% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -5.96% | -8.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -4.16% | -2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.48% | 1.70% | +3.78% |
Volatility
JILGX vs. PALDX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) at 3.05%. This indicates that JILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PALDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILGX | PALDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 3.05% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.61% | 5.86% | +7.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 11.52% | +7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 12.08% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 12.75% | +1.62% |