JILGX vs. ABALX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX).
JILGX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 13, 2005. ABALX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Jul 26, 1975.
Performance
JILGX vs. ABALX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JILGX vs. ABALX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | -0.98% | 4.24% | 11.94% | 16.22% | -17.44% | 14.29% | 17.61% | 22.27% | -8.28% | 15.94% |
ABALX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A | -1.12% | 18.45% | 14.63% | 13.65% | -12.13% | 15.75% | 10.85% | 18.60% | -3.35% | 14.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILGX achieves a -0.98% return, which is significantly higher than ABALX's -1.12% return. Over the past 10 years, JILGX has underperformed ABALX with an annualized return of 7.61%, while ABALX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.17% annualized return.
JILGX
- 1D
- 2.61%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- YTD
- -0.98%
- 6M
- -9.22%
- 1Y
- 3.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
ABALX
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JILGX vs. ABALX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILGX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than ABALX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JILGX vs. ABALX — Risk / Return Rank
JILGX
ABALX
JILGX vs. ABALX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) and American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILGX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 1.56 | -1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | 2.28 | -1.86 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.32 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 2.43 | -2.43 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | 10.15 | -10.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILGX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 1.56 | -1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.79 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.87 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.79 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between JILGX and ABALX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JILGX vs. ABALX - Dividend Comparison
JILGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than ABALX's 8.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILGX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio | 2.40% | 2.38% | 2.94% | 6.20% | 14.58% | 10.72% | 6.35% | 12.46% | 11.94% | 6.15% | 7.98% | 8.76% |
ABALX American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A | 8.39% | 8.27% | 6.87% | 2.05% | 2.30% | 4.30% | 4.35% | 3.49% | 5.49% | 4.72% | 4.24% | 5.60% |
Drawdowns
JILGX vs. ABALX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILGX drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than ABALX's maximum drawdown of -40.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILGX and ABALX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILGX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.66% | -40.20% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.01% | -7.33% | -6.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.25% | -18.76% | -6.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.58% | -22.34% | -7.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.77% | -5.37% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -3.86% | -3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 1.76% | +3.77% |
Volatility
JILGX vs. ABALX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio (JILGX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to American Funds American Balanced Fund Class A (ABALX) at 3.89%. This indicates that JILGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ABALX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JILGX | ABALX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 3.89% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 6.96% | +6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.96% | 11.22% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.41% | 10.45% | +3.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 10.63% | +3.76% |