JILCX vs. JIBCX
JILCX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio) and JIBCX (John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - JILCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock, while JIBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JILCX returned 4.42%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for JIBCX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JILCX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for JIBCX.
Performance
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a 3.60% return, which is significantly lower than JIBCX's 5.13% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has underperformed JIBCX with an annualized return of 4.42%, while JIBCX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 3.86%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.24%
- 5Y*
- 3.25%
- 10Y*
- 4.42%
JIBCX
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 4.99%
- YTD
- 5.13%
- 6M
- -3.68%
- 1Y
- 10.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.73%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.60% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | 5.13% | 8.28% | 35.89% | 49.47% | -38.12% | 16.88% | 34.25% | 29.71% | 1.72% | 36.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between JILCX and JIBCX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2005 | 0.68 |
The correlation between JILCX and JIBCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JILCX vs. JIBCX — Risk / Return Rank
JILCX
JIBCX
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JILCX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.14 | +0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 0.53 | +3.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.18 | 1.27 | +14.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JILCX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.00 | 0.71 | +2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.41 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 | 0.68 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.95 | 0.53 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum JIBCX drawdown of -54.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and JIBCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILCX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -54.15% | +31.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.58% | -24.47% | +20.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.06% | -24.47% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -42.74% | +26.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.51% | -42.74% | +26.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.71% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -9.28% | +6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 9.68% | -8.71% |
Volatility
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) is 1.65%, while John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a volatility of 3.62%. This indicates that JILCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JIBCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JILCX | JIBCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 3.62% | -1.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.47% | 14.71% | -11.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.35% | 18.40% | -14.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.49% | 24.50% | -19.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.07% | 23.02% | -17.95% |
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JIBCX's 0.81% expense ratio.
Dividends
JILCX vs. JIBCX - Dividend Comparison
JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, while JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.97% | 3.23% | 5.57% | 16.46% | 4.72% | 1.46% | 7.73% | 16.16% | 6.35% | 13.20% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 3.81% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JILCX and JIBCX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JIBCX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to JILCX (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILCX dropped -22.90% vs JIBCX's -54.15%.
JILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JILCX and JIBCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer