JILCX vs. JHNBX
JILCX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio) and JHNBX (John Hancock Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - JILCX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by John Hancock, while JHNBX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JILCX returned 4.17%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for JHNBX. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. JILCX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for JHNBX.
Performance
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a 2.86% return, which is significantly higher than JHNBX's -0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has outperformed JHNBX with an annualized return of 4.17%, while JHNBX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.89% annualized return.
JILCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 2.86%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- 4.17%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.65%
JHNBX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.56%
- 6M
- -1.23%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 1Y
- 1.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- -0.63%
- 10Y*
- 1.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 2.86% | 9.33% | 6.12% | 9.17% | -11.73% | 3.55% | 9.85% | 12.00% | -3.33% | 6.12% |
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | -0.97% | 7.53% | 1.97% | 6.24% | -15.22% | -0.68% | 10.31% | 10.09% | -1.15% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between JILCX and JHNBX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.66 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005 | 0.42 |
The correlation between JILCX and JHNBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.68 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JILCX vs. JHNBX — Risk / Return Rank
JILCX
JHNBX
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JILCX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.12 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 0.81 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.27 | 2.06 | +8.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum JHNBX drawdown of -24.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and JHNBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JILCX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.90% | -24.74% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.58% | -3.25% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.73% | -5.67% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.51% | -20.13% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.51% | -20.13% | +3.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -3.33% | +2.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.49% | -4.14% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 1.28% | -0.51% |
Volatility
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) has a higher volatility of 1.20% compared to John Hancock Bond Fund (JHNBX) at 1.03%. This indicates that JILCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHNBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JILCX | JHNBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.03% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.76% | 3.12% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.72% | 3.92% | +0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.56% | 5.89% | -0.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.09% | 4.93% | +0.16% |
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than JHNBX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Dividends
JILCX vs. JHNBX - Dividend Comparison
JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.00%, less than JHNBX's 4.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHNBX John Hancock Bond Fund | 4.21% | 4.41% | 4.14% | 3.80% | 2.93% | 3.30% | 5.50% | 3.75% | 3.51% | 3.23% | 3.19% | 3.48% |
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio | 4.00% | 4.15% | 4.17% | 3.89% | 6.79% | 6.25% | 4.53% | 4.01% | 4.39% | 2.44% | 4.26% | 5.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JILCX and JHNBX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JILCX has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to JHNBX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILCX dropped -22.90% vs JHNBX's -24.74%.
JILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JILCX and JHNBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer