JILCX vs. JILMX

In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly higher than JILMX's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has outperformed JILMX with an annualized return of 2.23%, while JILMX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.42% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than JILMX's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current JILCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is higher than the JILMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILCX and JILMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.23%, more than JILMX's 3.57% yield.

The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -23.44%, smaller than the maximum JILMX drawdown of -35.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and JILMX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.