JILCX vs. JILMX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JILCX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio) and JILMX (John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JILCX returned 4.46%/yr vs 6.04%/yr for JILMX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JILCX charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for JILMX.

Performance

JILCX vs. JILMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JILCX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than JILMX's 6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, JILCX has underperformed JILMX with an annualized return of 4.46%, while JILMX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.04% annualized return.

JILCX

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 3.44%
• 6M: 3.37%
• 1Y: 9.20%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 3.17%
• 10Y*: 4.46%

JILMX

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 1.59%
• YTD: 6.31%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: 9.94%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 6.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JILCX vs. JILMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio	3.44%	9.33%	6.12%	9.17%	-11.73%	3.55%	9.85%	12.00%	-3.33%	6.12%
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio	6.31%	7.55%	7.62%	11.53%	-13.82%	7.82%	12.24%	15.66%	-4.93%	9.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JILCX and JILMX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005	0.92

The correlation between JILCX and JILMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JILCX vs. JILMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JILCX

JILCX Risk / Return Rank: 83
JILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
JILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
JILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
JILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
JILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

JILMX

JILMX Risk / Return Rank: 36
JILMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
JILMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
JILMX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
JILMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
JILMX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JILCX vs. JILMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) and John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JILCX	JILMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	1.55	+0.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.89	2.09	+1.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	2.19	+1.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.47	8.08	+6.39

JILCX vs. JILMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JILCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the JILMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JILCX and JILMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JILCX vs. JILMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JILCX drawdown since its inception was -22.90%, smaller than the maximum JILMX drawdown of -34.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JILCX and JILMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JILCX	JILMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.90%	-34.35%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.58%	-5.84%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.06%	-7.50%	+2.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.51%	-19.41%	+2.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.51%	-19.81%	+3.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.15%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.50%	-3.71%	+1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.77%	1.46%	-0.69%

Volatility

JILCX vs. JILMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio (JILCX) is 1.88%, while John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio (JILMX) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that JILCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JILMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JILCX	JILMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	2.95%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.75%	6.97%	-3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.65%	8.23%	-3.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.54%	8.11%	-2.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.09%	7.85%	-2.76%

JILCX vs. JILMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JILCX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than JILMX's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

JILCX vs. JILMX - Dividend Comparison

JILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than JILMX's 3.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JILCX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Conservative Portfolio	3.82%	4.15%	4.17%	3.89%	6.79%	6.25%	4.53%	4.01%	4.39%	2.44%	4.26%	5.65%
JILMX John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio	3.07%	3.57%	3.52%	4.72%	9.33%	8.71%	5.19%	6.92%	7.31%	5.11%	5.51%	6.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JILCX and JILMX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, JILCX and JILMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JILCX or JILMX?

JILMX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to JILCX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JILCX dropped -22.90% vs JILMX's -34.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.