PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBFX vs. BIMSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBFX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX has underperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.83% annualized return.


JIBFX

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.82%
6M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.45%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
3.95%
5Y*
-0.50%
10Y*
1.57%
ALL TIME*
1.14%

BIMSX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.22%
6M
-0.02%
YTD
0.06%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
1.83%
ALL TIME*
3.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
-0.45%7.87%1.21%5.43%-13.69%-2.04%9.71%8.95%0.10%3.73%
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
0.06%6.76%3.21%5.53%-8.88%-1.68%7.16%6.83%0.30%2.53%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBFX and BIMSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000

0.89

The correlation between JIBFX and BIMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBFX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JIBFX
JIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
JIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMSX
BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JIBFXBIMSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.54

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

3.97

-1.52

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the BIMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBFX and BIMSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBFX and BIMSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBFXBIMSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-13.07%

-6.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-1.87%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.81%

-2.37%

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-13.00%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

-13.07%

-6.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.50%

-1.10%

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-1.58%

-3.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

0.72%

+0.53%

Volatility

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison

Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.00% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that JIBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBFXBIMSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.00%

0.67%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.03%

1.95%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.95%

2.49%

+1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

3.88%

+2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.25%

+2.08%

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBFX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison

JIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than BIMSX's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.61%3.50%3.44%2.81%1.81%1.90%3.08%2.16%2.14%1.98%1.89%2.21%
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
4.01%3.85%3.69%2.92%2.41%1.75%3.11%2.76%2.77%2.52%3.03%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, JIBFX and BIMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIBFX has higher volatility (1.00%) compared to BIMSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBFX dropped -19.54% vs BIMSX's -13.07%.

BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBFX and BIMSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer