PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BIMSX vs. BAGSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BIMSXBAGSX
YTD Return3.19%2.45%
1Y Return7.58%9.36%
3Y Return (Ann)-0.47%-2.04%
5Y Return (Ann)0.61%-0.09%
10Y Return (Ann)1.47%1.53%
Sharpe Ratio2.071.61
Sortino Ratio3.142.37
Omega Ratio1.401.29
Calmar Ratio0.700.58
Martin Ratio8.756.02
Ulcer Index0.87%1.57%
Daily Std Dev3.67%5.90%
Max Drawdown-14.54%-19.80%
Current Drawdown-4.09%-8.56%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BIMSX and BAGSX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a 3.19% return, which is significantly higher than BAGSX's 2.45% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BIMSX having a 1.47% annualized return and BAGSX not far ahead at 1.53%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.57%
4.11%
BIMSX
BAGSX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BIMSX and BAGSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for BIMSX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for BAGSX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIMSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 8.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.75
BAGSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 6.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.02

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the BAGSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMSX and BAGSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.07
1.61
BIMSX
BAGSX

Dividends

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Dividend Comparison

BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, less than BAGSX's 3.49% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.36%2.80%1.83%1.24%1.83%2.17%2.13%1.95%1.90%1.93%2.06%2.16%
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.49%3.10%2.33%1.58%1.94%2.41%2.53%2.21%2.14%2.17%2.53%2.99%

Drawdowns

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, smaller than the maximum BAGSX drawdown of -19.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and BAGSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.09%
-8.56%
BIMSX
BAGSX

Volatility

BIMSX vs. BAGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) is 0.95%, while Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that BIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BAGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.95%
1.63%
BIMSX
BAGSX