PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBFX vs. JIBDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than JIBDX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX has underperformed JIBDX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while JIBDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.10% annualized return.


JIBFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.24%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.82%

JIBDX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.07%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.75%
1Y
3.64%
3Y*
4.53%
5Y*
1.92%
10Y*
2.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
0.19%7.87%1.21%5.43%-13.69%-2.04%9.71%8.95%0.10%3.73%
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
0.32%5.91%3.98%4.77%-4.29%-0.91%3.91%4.65%1.14%1.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBFX and JIBDX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2000

0.84

The correlation between JIBFX and JIBDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBFX vs. JIBDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBFX
JIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JIBDX
JIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
JIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBFXJIBDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

2.64

-1.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

4.10

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.58

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.12

-1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

11.18

-5.89

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the JIBDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBFX and JIBDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBFXJIBDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.64

-1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.91

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

1.18

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.46

-0.22

Drawdowns

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, which is greater than JIBDX's maximum drawdown of -8.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBFX and JIBDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBFXJIBDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-8.51%

-11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-1.19%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-1.19%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-6.87%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

-6.95%

-12.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-0.53%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-2.48%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.33%

+0.68%

Volatility

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Volatility Comparison

Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund (JIBDX) at 0.48%. This indicates that JIBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIBDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBFXJIBDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

0.48%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

1.00%

+1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

1.36%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

2.12%

+4.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

1.79%

+3.54%

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JIBFX and JIBDX have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JIBFX vs. JIBDX - Dividend Comparison

JIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than JIBDX's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JIBDX
Johnson Institutional Short Duration Bond Fund
3.68%3.92%2.88%2.08%1.26%0.99%1.73%2.39%2.21%1.67%1.97%0.92%
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
3.93%3.85%3.69%2.92%2.41%1.75%3.11%2.76%2.77%2.52%3.03%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBFX and JIBDX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JIBFX has higher volatility (1.39%) compared to JIBDX (0.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBFX dropped -19.54% vs JIBDX's -8.51%.

JIBDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBFX and JIBDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer