PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JIBFX vs. JENHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Johnson Enhanced Return Fund (JENHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBFX achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than JENHX's 10.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBFX has underperformed JENHX with an annualized return of 1.82%, while JENHX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.


JIBFX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.19%
6M
0.24%
1Y
5.42%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
0.03%
10Y*
1.82%

JENHX

1D
0.22%
1M
4.96%
YTD
10.33%
6M
10.56%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
21.49%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
14.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
0.19%7.87%1.21%5.43%-13.69%-2.04%9.71%8.95%0.10%3.73%
JENHX
Johnson Enhanced Return Fund
10.33%18.37%22.31%24.92%-23.62%26.54%19.34%33.79%-6.01%21.40%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBFX and JENHX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 6, 2006

-0.11

The correlation between JIBFX and JENHX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JIBFX vs. JENHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JIBFX
JIBFX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JIBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
JIBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

JENHX
JENHX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JENHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JENHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JENHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JENHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
JENHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) and Johnson Enhanced Return Fund (JENHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JIBFXJENHXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.26

2.41

-1.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

3.30

-1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

3.07

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.28

14.17

-8.88

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the JENHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBFX and JENHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JIBFXJENHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.26

2.41

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

0.67

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.79

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.41

-0.17

Drawdowns

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBFX drawdown since its inception was -19.54%, smaller than the maximum JENHX drawdown of -61.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBFX and JENHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JIBFXJENHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.54%

-61.05%

+41.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-9.45%

+6.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-18.37%

+11.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.96%

-29.66%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.54%

-36.15%

+16.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

0.00%

-2.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-11.23%

+6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

2.04%

-1.03%

Volatility

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund (JIBFX) is 1.39%, while Johnson Enhanced Return Fund (JENHX) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that JIBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JENHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JIBFXJENHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.39%

3.07%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.86%

9.32%

-6.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

12.13%

-8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.54%

17.16%

-10.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

18.02%

-12.69%

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JENHX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

JIBFX vs. JENHX - Dividend Comparison

JIBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than JENHX's 17.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JENHX
Johnson Enhanced Return Fund
17.64%19.20%7.26%2.10%7.70%39.01%5.59%11.85%7.67%21.41%5.15%5.70%
JIBFX
Johnson Institutional Core Bond Fund
3.93%3.85%3.69%2.92%2.41%1.75%3.11%2.76%2.77%2.52%3.03%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


JIBFX and JENHX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JENHX has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to JIBFX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBFX dropped -19.54% vs JENHX's -61.05%.

JENHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JIBFX and JENHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer