BIMSX vs. VCIT
Compare and contrast key facts about Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT).
BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000. VCIT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 5-10 Year Corp Index. It was launched on Nov 19, 2009.
Performance
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.32% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.45% | 9.34% | 3.20% | 8.98% | -13.98% | -1.77% | 9.46% | 14.10% | -1.74% | 5.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a -0.32% return, which is significantly higher than VCIT's -0.45% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed VCIT with an annualized return of 2.02%, while VCIT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.06% annualized return.
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
VCIT
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 5.56%
- 5Y*
- 1.42%
- 10Y*
- 3.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIMSX vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank
BIMSX
VCIT
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIMSX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.50 | 1.26 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.23 | 1.76 | +0.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | 2.07 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.20 | 7.31 | +1.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIMSX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50 | 1.26 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | 0.22 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.49 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.75 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMSX and VCIT is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison
BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, less than VCIT's 4.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
VCIT Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF | 4.72% | 4.62% | 4.43% | 3.72% | 3.03% | 2.87% | 2.78% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 3.21% | 3.29% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, smaller than the maximum VCIT drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and VCIT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMSX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.07% | -20.56% | +7.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -2.99% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.00% | -20.56% | +7.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.07% | -20.56% | +7.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.98% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.59% | -3.18% | +1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.85% | -0.36% |
Volatility
BIMSX vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) is 1.05%, while Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that BIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIMSX | VCIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.05% | 2.07% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.67% | 2.84% | -1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80% | 4.85% | -2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.86% | 6.60% | -2.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 6.27% | -3.03% |