PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMSX vs. BIMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a 0.06% return, which is significantly higher than BIMIX's -0.46% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed BIMIX with an annualized return of 1.83%, while BIMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.98% annualized return.


BIMSX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.22%
6M
-0.02%
YTD
0.06%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
4.52%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
1.83%
ALL TIME*
3.70%

BIMIX

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.31%
6M
-0.57%
YTD
-0.46%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
4.43%
5Y*
0.92%
10Y*
1.98%
ALL TIME*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
0.06%6.76%3.21%5.53%-8.88%-1.68%7.16%6.83%0.30%2.53%
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
-0.46%6.69%3.45%5.78%-8.64%-1.41%7.42%7.05%0.58%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMSX and BIMIX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2000

0.95

The correlation between BIMSX and BIMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMSX vs. BIMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BIMSX
BIMSX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BIMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BIMIX
BIMIX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
BIMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIMSXBIMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.17

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

2.59

+1.38

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the BIMIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMSX and BIMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BIMIX drawdown of -12.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and BIMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMSXBIMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.07%

-12.76%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.87%

-2.08%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.37%

-2.36%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.00%

-12.68%

-0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.07%

-12.76%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-1.72%

+0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

-1.48%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

0.93%

-0.21%

Volatility

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional (BIMIX) have volatilities of 0.67% and 0.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMSXBIMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

0.68%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

1.94%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49%

2.49%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

3.90%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

3.26%

-0.01%

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMSX vs. BIMIX - Dividend Comparison

BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than BIMIX's 3.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMIX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund Class Institutional
3.41%3.67%3.89%3.21%2.17%2.27%3.49%2.52%2.50%2.35%2.21%2.57%
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.61%3.50%3.44%2.81%1.81%1.90%3.08%2.16%2.14%1.98%1.89%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


BIMSX and BIMIX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIMIX has higher volatility (0.68%) compared to BIMSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMSX dropped -13.07% vs BIMIX's -12.76%.

BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMSX and BIMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer