BIMSX vs. FBND
BIMSX (Baird Intermediate Bond Fund) and FBND (Fidelity Total Bond ETF) are both funds - BIMSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird, while FBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX returned 1.83%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for FBND. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BIMSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for FBND.
Performance
BIMSX vs. FBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIMSX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than FBND's -0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMSX has underperformed FBND with an annualized return of 1.83%, while FBND has yielded a comparatively higher 2.28% annualized return.
BIMSX
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 1.94%
- 3Y*
- 4.52%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 1.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.69%
FBND
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 2.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.34%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $137.95M | $129.50M | $125.63M |
BIMSX vs. FBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.12% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | -0.08% | 7.57% | 2.13% | 6.81% | -12.54% | -0.43% | 9.41% | 9.82% | -0.57% | 3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIMSX and FBND is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2014 | 0.80 |
The correlation between BIMSX and FBND shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.91 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIMSX vs. FBND — Risk / Return Rank
BIMSX
FBND
BIMSX vs. FBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) and Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIMSX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.11 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.88 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 2.22 | +1.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIMSX vs. FBND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIMSX drawdown since its inception was -13.07%, smaller than the maximum FBND drawdown of -17.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMSX and FBND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIMSX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.07% | -17.25% | +4.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.87% | -2.66% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.37% | -4.95% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.79% | -17.25% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.07% | -17.25% | +4.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -2.00% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -3.32% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 1.05% | -0.32% |
Volatility
BIMSX vs. FBND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) is 0.68%, while Fidelity Total Bond ETF (FBND) has a volatility of 0.97%. This indicates that BIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIMSX | FBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 0.97% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 2.95% | -0.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49% | 3.71% | -1.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.88% | 5.93% | -2.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.25% | 6.10% | -2.85% |
BIMSX vs. FBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIMSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FBND's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
BIMSX vs. FBND - Dividend Comparison
BIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, less than FBND's 4.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.62% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
FBND Fidelity Total Bond ETF | 4.76% | 4.70% | 4.73% | 4.26% | 3.07% | 1.86% | 4.25% | 2.90% | 2.93% | 2.56% | 2.84% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIMSX and FBND have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBND has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to BIMSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMSX dropped -13.07% vs FBND's -17.25%.
BIMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIMSX and FBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer