JIBCX vs. VOT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

JIBCX (John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - JIBCX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by John Hancock, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. Over the past 10 years, JIBCX returned 14.12%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. JIBCX charges 0.81%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

JIBCX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JIBCX achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBCX has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 14.12%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 11.66% annualized return.

JIBCX

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -2.61%
• 6M: -1.17%
• YTD: -3.11%
• 1Y: -6.06%
• 3Y*: 15.16%
• 5Y*: 6.01%
• 10Y*: 14.12%
• ALL TIME*: 11.18%

VOT

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 7.03%
• YTD: 6.22%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 12.46%
• 5Y*: 4.89%
• 10Y*: 11.66%
• ALL TIME*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	$53.27M	$59.32M	$61.74M

JIBCX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	-3.11%	8.28%	35.89%	49.47%	-38.12%	16.88%	34.25%	29.71%	1.72%	36.25%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	6.22%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between JIBCX and VOT is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between JIBCX and VOT has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JIBCX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JIBCX

JIBCX Risk / Return Rank: 2
JIBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
JIBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
JIBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
JIBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
JIBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 13
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JIBCX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JIBCX	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.13	-0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.26	0.30	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.03	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.24	0.14	-0.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	0.40	-0.91

JIBCX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JIBCX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JIBCX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JIBCX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JIBCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBCX and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JIBCX	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.15%	-60.16%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.47%	-15.96%	-8.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.47%	-21.77%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.74%	-37.19%	-5.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.74%	-37.19%	-5.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.02%	-3.52%	-10.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.29%	-9.90%	+0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.72%	5.42%	+5.30%

Volatility

JIBCX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.19%. This indicates that JIBCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JIBCX	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	4.19%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.51%	13.89%	+0.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.17%	17.20%	+2.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.76%	21.56%	+3.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.12%	21.02%	+2.10%

JIBCX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JIBCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

JIBCX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	6.97%	3.23%	5.57%	16.46%	4.72%	1.46%	7.73%	16.16%	6.35%	13.20%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JIBCX and VOT in my portfolio?

JIBCX and VOT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JIBCX or VOT?

JIBCX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to VOT (4.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JIBCX dropped -54.15% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.13 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.