JIBCX vs. VOT
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT).
JIBCX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 14, 2005. VOT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. It was launched on Aug 17, 2006.
Performance
JIBCX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JIBCX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | -11.51% | 8.28% | 35.89% | 49.47% | -38.12% | 16.88% | 34.25% | 29.71% | 1.72% | 36.25% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -6.47% | 10.72% | 16.38% | 23.10% | -28.87% | 20.50% | 34.50% | 33.76% | -5.56% | 21.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JIBCX achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's -6.47% return. Over the past 10 years, JIBCX has outperformed VOT with an annualized return of 13.64%, while VOT has yielded a comparatively lower 10.76% annualized return.
JIBCX
- 1D
- 3.96%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -11.51%
- 6M
- -18.02%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 18.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
VOT
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- -6.47%
- 6M
- -11.02%
- 1Y
- 6.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JIBCX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison
JIBCX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JIBCX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank
JIBCX
VOT
JIBCX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JIBCX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.54 | 0.59 | -0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.08 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 0.45 | -0.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 1.40 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JIBCX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.20 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.52 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.42 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between JIBCX and VOT is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JIBCX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison
JIBCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JIBCX John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.97% | 3.23% | 5.57% | 16.46% | 4.72% | 1.46% | 7.73% | 16.16% | 6.35% | 13.20% |
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.71% | 0.64% | 0.67% | 0.71% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.56% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.72% | 0.81% | 0.81% |
Drawdowns
JIBCX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JIBCX drawdown since its inception was -54.15%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JIBCX and VOT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JIBCX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.15% | -60.16% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.47% | -15.96% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.74% | -37.19% | -5.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.74% | -37.19% | -5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -12.28% | -9.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -10.01% | +0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.51% | 5.16% | +5.35% |
Volatility
JIBCX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Funds II Blue Chip Growth Fund (JIBCX) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 6.63%. This indicates that JIBCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JIBCX | VOT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 6.63% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.08% | 12.39% | +2.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.49% | 21.04% | +5.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 21.33% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 20.92% | +2.06% |