JHMM vs. KOMP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) and KOMP (SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - JHMM tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index while KOMP tracks the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMM returned 8.41%/yr vs 1.98%/yr for KOMP. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHMM charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for KOMP.

Performance

JHMM vs. KOMP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.48% return, which is significantly lower than KOMP's 15.70% return.

JHMM

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 1.45%
• YTD: 12.48%
• 6M: 10.73%
• 1Y: 23.57%
• 3Y*: 16.58%
• 5Y*: 8.41%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

KOMP

• 1D: -2.64%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: 15.70%
• 6M: 12.72%
• 1Y: 34.68%
• 3Y*: 18.75%
• 5Y*: 1.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. KOMP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	12.48%	10.73%	14.61%	14.53%	-15.30%	24.54%	16.22%	30.01%	-9.07%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	15.70%	19.74%	10.05%	20.09%	-32.21%	3.67%	61.28%	37.12%	-10.32%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and KOMP is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018	0.87

The correlation between JHMM and KOMP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. KOMP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JHMM	KOMP
Technology	19.3%	35.5%
Industrials	19.0%	27.7%
Financial Services	14.8%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	4.3%
Healthcare	10.5%	11.1%
Real Estate	5.2%	-
Utilities	5.1%	4.8%
Energy	4.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	4.1%	2.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.6%	0.2%
Communication Services	2.7%	5.3%

Return for Risk

JHMM vs. KOMP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM

JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 54
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 47
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 42
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 38
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. KOMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JHMM	KOMP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.41	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	1.93	+0.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.24	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	2.25	+0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.54	6.97	+3.57

JHMM vs. KOMP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the KOMP Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and KOMP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. KOMP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum KOMP drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and KOMP.

Drawdown Indicators

	JHMM	KOMP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.71%	-50.06%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.64%	-15.50%	+6.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.88%	-24.93%	+3.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.10%	-45.38%	+21.28%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-8.32%	+7.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-21.58%	+16.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	4.99%	-2.75%

Volatility

JHMM vs. KOMP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 4.42%, while SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a volatility of 10.71%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KOMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JHMM	KOMP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	10.71%	-6.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.89%	19.81%	-8.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	24.71%	-10.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.36%	25.08%	-6.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.59%	27.13%	-7.54%

JHMM vs. KOMP - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than KOMP's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHMM vs. KOMP - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than KOMP's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF	0.87%	0.98%	1.01%	1.17%	1.16%	0.72%	1.04%	1.02%	1.36%	0.90%	1.15%	0.33%
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.51%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JHMM and KOMP in my portfolio?

JHMM and KOMP have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JHMM or KOMP?

KOMP has higher volatility (10.71%) compared to JHMM (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs KOMP's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, JHMM or KOMP?

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.41% vs 1.98% for KOMP. On fees, KOMP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JHMM or KOMP?

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.41% return vs 1.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JHMM or KOMP?

KOMP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JHMM or KOMP?

KOMP has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

What is the main difference between JHMM and KOMP?

JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while KOMP tracks S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.20% for KOMP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.