PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. JHEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. JHEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than JHEM's 27.48% return.


JHMM

1D
1.01%
1M
2.92%
YTD
12.87%
6M
14.13%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.91%

JHEM

1D
0.77%
1M
10.03%
YTD
27.48%
6M
30.79%
1Y
54.07%
3Y*
22.81%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. JHEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.87%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-15.82%
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
27.48%30.49%4.58%12.94%-17.90%2.10%11.50%17.68%-7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and JHEM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018

0.64

The correlation between JHMM and JHEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHMM vs. JHEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
JHEM

Industrials

19.4%
8.4%

Technology

17.2%
26.5%

Financial Services

15.3%
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
11.7%

Healthcare

10.2%
3.0%

Utilities

5.4%
2.9%

Energy

5.4%
5.3%

Real Estate

5.4%
0.6%

Basic Materials

4.2%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
7.5%

Industrials

JHMM
19.4%
JHEM
8.4%

Technology

JHMM
17.2%
JHEM
26.5%

Financial Services

JHMM
15.3%
JHEM
21.9%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
11.0%
JHEM
11.7%

Healthcare

JHMM
10.2%
JHEM
3.0%

Utilities

JHMM
5.4%
JHEM
2.9%

Energy

JHMM
5.4%
JHEM
5.3%

Real Estate

JHMM
5.4%
JHEM
0.6%

Basic Materials

JHMM
4.2%
JHEM
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
3.7%
JHEM
3.5%

Communication Services

JHMM
2.7%
JHEM
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. JHEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JHEM
JHEM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
JHEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
JHEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. JHEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMMJHEMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

2.92

-1.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

3.78

-1.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.54

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

4.43

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.85

17.23

-5.38

JHMM vs. JHEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the JHEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and JHEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMMJHEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

2.92

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.49

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.46

+0.17

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. JHEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than JHEM's maximum drawdown of -34.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and JHEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMJHEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-34.99%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-12.34%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-18.16%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-32.11%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-9.95%

+4.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

3.17%

-0.94%

Volatility

JHMM vs. JHEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (JHEM) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JHEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMJHEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

8.00%

-4.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

16.18%

-5.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

18.64%

-4.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

17.61%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

20.60%

-1.00%

JHMM vs. JHEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than JHEM's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. JHEM - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than JHEM's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHEM
John Hancock Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
1.88%2.39%2.93%2.87%2.84%2.71%1.67%2.37%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMM and JHEM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JHEM has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs JHEM's -34.99%.

On 5-year performance, JHMM leads with 8.57% vs 8.51% for JHEM. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 8.57% return vs 8.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JHEM.

JHEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.

JHMM is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while JHEM is Emerging Markets Equities. JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while JHEM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Emerging Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.49% for JHEM.

JHEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and JHEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer