PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMM vs. IPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHMM vs. IPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMM achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly lower than IPO's 26.20% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHMM having a 11.91% annualized return and IPO not far behind at 11.41%.


JHMM

1D
1.01%
1M
2.92%
YTD
12.87%
6M
14.13%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.91%

IPO

1D
-0.95%
1M
15.90%
YTD
26.20%
6M
26.45%
1Y
33.87%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
-0.79%
10Y*
11.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHMM vs. IPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
12.87%10.73%14.61%14.53%-15.30%24.54%16.22%30.01%-9.57%19.96%
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
26.20%5.45%15.68%52.55%-57.26%-10.31%107.88%34.11%-17.24%37.16%

Correlation

The correlation between JHMM and IPO is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2015

0.69

The correlation between JHMM and IPO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JHMM vs. IPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHMM
IPO

Industrials

19.4%
9.1%

Technology

17.2%
40.3%

Financial Services

15.3%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

11.0%
14.4%

Healthcare

10.2%
10.8%

Utilities

5.4%
0.3%

Energy

5.4%
1.1%

Real Estate

5.4%
4.0%

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
9.2%

Communication Services

2.7%
6.6%

Industrials

JHMM
19.4%
IPO
9.1%

Technology

JHMM
17.2%
IPO
40.3%

Financial Services

JHMM
15.3%
IPO
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JHMM
11.0%
IPO
14.4%

Healthcare

JHMM
10.2%
IPO
10.8%

Utilities

JHMM
5.4%
IPO
0.3%

Energy

JHMM
5.4%
IPO
1.1%

Real Estate

JHMM
5.4%
IPO
4.0%

Basic Materials

JHMM
4.2%
IPO

-

Consumer Defensive

JHMM
3.7%
IPO
9.2%

Communication Services

JHMM
2.7%
IPO
6.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHMM vs. IPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMM
JHMM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JHMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMM Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMM Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IPO
IPO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMM vs. IPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) and Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMMIPODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.88

1.18

+0.70

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

1.71

+0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.20

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

1.35

+1.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.85

3.04

+8.81

JHMM vs. IPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is higher than the IPO Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMM and IPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMMIPODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88

1.18

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

-0.02

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.36

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.31

+0.32

Drawdowns

JHMM vs. IPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMM drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, smaller than the maximum IPO drawdown of -68.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMM and IPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMMIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-68.76%

+28.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-26.24%

+17.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.88%

-32.04%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.10%

-66.02%

+41.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.71%

-68.76%

+28.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-23.75%

+23.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-22.93%

+17.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

11.67%

-9.44%

Volatility

JHMM vs. IPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM) is 3.85%, while Renaissance IPO ETF (IPO) has a volatility of 9.45%. This indicates that JHMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMMIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

9.45%

-5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

22.23%

-11.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.11%

28.89%

-14.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.32%

35.86%

-17.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.60%

31.50%

-11.90%

JHMM vs. IPO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than IPO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHMM vs. IPO - Dividend Comparison

JHMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than IPO's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPO
Renaissance IPO ETF
0.45%0.66%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.26%0.49%0.43%0.40%0.11%
JHMM
John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF
0.87%0.98%1.01%1.17%1.16%0.72%1.04%1.02%1.36%0.90%1.15%0.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHMM and IPO have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IPO has higher volatility (9.45%) compared to JHMM (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMM dropped -40.71% vs IPO's -68.76%.

On 10-year performance, JHMM leads with 11.91% vs 11.41% for IPO. On fees, JHMM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHMM has been the lower-risk option at 3.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JHMM has performed better with a 11.91% return vs 11.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHMM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for IPO.

JHMM has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.45% for IPO.

JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index, while IPO tracks Renaissance IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for JHMM and 0.60% for IPO.

JHMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHMM and IPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer