PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHML vs. HLAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHML vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.


JHML

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.80%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%

HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
11.62%15.91%19.84%21.16%-15.94%26.90%17.02%7.79%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%28.64%24.65%10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and HLAL is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.92

The correlation between JHML and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

JHML vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JHML
HLAL

Technology

27.8%
50.4%

Financial Services

13.8%
0.0%

Industrials

12.2%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
5.6%

Healthcare

9.0%
10.5%

Communication Services

8.4%
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
2.9%

Energy

4.3%
4.5%

Utilities

4.0%
1.0%

Basic Materials

2.8%
2.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
0.8%

Technology

JHML
27.8%
HLAL
50.4%

Financial Services

JHML
13.8%
HLAL
0.0%

Industrials

JHML
12.2%
HLAL
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

JHML
10.3%
HLAL
5.6%

Healthcare

JHML
9.0%
HLAL
10.5%

Communication Services

JHML
8.4%
HLAL
16.7%

Consumer Defensive

JHML
5.1%
HLAL
2.9%

Energy

JHML
4.3%
HLAL
4.5%

Utilities

JHML
4.0%
HLAL
1.0%

Basic Materials

JHML
2.8%
HLAL
2.5%

Real Estate

JHML
2.4%
HLAL
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHML vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMLHLALDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.59

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

4.30

-0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

19.85

-4.24

JHML vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMLHLALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

3.33

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.91

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.89

-0.08

Drawdowns

JHML vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than HLAL's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and HLAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMLHLALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-33.57%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-10.20%

+2.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-21.67%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-23.18%

-0.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-0.07%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-5.00%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.20%

-0.49%

Volatility

JHML vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 2.84%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHMLHLALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

3.70%

-0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

9.95%

-1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

13.17%

-1.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

17.60%

-1.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

20.21%

-2.45%

JHML vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHML vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF
0.95%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHML and HLAL have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 11.88% for JHML. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHML has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 11.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HLAL.

JHML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.50% for HLAL.

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHML and HLAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer