JHML vs. GRNY
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY).
JHML and GRNY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JHML is a passively managed fund by Manulife that tracks the performance of the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index. It was launched on Sep 28, 2015. GRNY is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Nov 7, 2024.
Performance
JHML vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHML vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | -1.33% | 15.91% | -2.57% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | -2.95% | 24.05% | -1.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly higher than GRNY's -2.95% return.
JHML
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 17.77%
- 3Y*
- 16.45%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.99%
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -4.26%
- YTD
- -2.95%
- 6M
- -4.49%
- 1Y
- 30.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHML vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHML vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
JHML
GRNY
JHML vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHML | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.26 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.86 | -0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 2.41 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.24 | 7.89 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHML | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.26 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.56 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHML and GRNY is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JHML vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, while GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHML John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF | 1.07% | 1.06% | 1.16% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.08% | 1.59% | 1.73% | 1.57% | 1.44% | 1.36% | 0.38% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JHML vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and GRNY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHML | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.13% | -24.18% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -13.36% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -8.39% | +3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -4.33% | -0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 4.08% | -1.57% |
Volatility
JHML vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 5.13%, while Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHML | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 6.27% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 14.35% | -5.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 24.51% | -6.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.29% | 24.00% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 24.00% | -6.25% |