GRNY vs. COST

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, GRNY returned 24.50% vs -4.12% for COST. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GRNY vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 9.17% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 11.37% return.

GRNY

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 24.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COST

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -6.86%
• YTD: 11.37%
• 6M: 12.35%
• 1Y: -4.12%
• 3Y*: 23.87%
• 5Y*: 20.85%
• 10Y*: 21.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNY vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	9.17%	24.05%	-0.45%
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	11.37%	-5.39%	1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNY and COST is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024	0.15

The correlation between GRNY and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GRNY vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNY

GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 40
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

COST

COST Risk / Return Rank: 31
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 28
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNY vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRNY	COST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	-0.22	+1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	-0.18	+2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.98	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	-0.28	+2.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	-0.61	+7.01

GRNY vs. COST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNY and COST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRNY vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and COST.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNY	COST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.18%	-53.39%	+29.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-14.93%	+3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-12.49%	+9.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-13.36%	+9.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	6.90%	-3.06%

Volatility

GRNY vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is 5.45%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that GRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRNY	COST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	6.38%	-0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.01%	14.49%	-1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	18.93%	-0.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.13%	22.73%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.13%	21.97%	+1.16%

Dividends

GRNY vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation	0.56%	0.59%	0.49%	2.87%	0.76%	0.54%	3.38%	0.86%	1.08%	4.81%	1.09%	4.06%
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNY and COST in my portfolio?

GRNY and COST have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRNY or COST?

COST has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to GRNY (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNY dropped -24.18% vs COST's -53.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.