GRNY vs. COST
GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, GRNY returned 21.98% vs -3.99% for COST. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GRNY vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GRNY achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 7.73% return.
GRNY
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 7.68%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 21.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- 7.73%
- 1Y
- -3.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.82%
- 5Y*
- 18.99%
- 10Y*
- 20.76%
GRNY vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 11.63% | 24.05% | -0.45% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 7.73% | -5.39% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between GRNY and COST is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024 | 0.13 |
The correlation between GRNY and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GRNY vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
GRNY
COST
GRNY vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GRNY | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.98 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.24 | +2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | -0.56 | +6.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GRNY vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, smaller than the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GRNY | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -53.39% | +29.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -16.57% | +4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.22% | -15.34% | +14.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.87% | -13.36% | +9.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | 7.14% | -3.29% |
Volatility
GRNY vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is 4.56%, while Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that GRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GRNY | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 6.82% | -2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 14.82% | -1.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 19.61% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 22.86% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.89% | 21.99% | +0.90% |
Dividends
GRNY vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
GRNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than COST's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.58% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GRNY and COST have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to GRNY (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNY dropped -24.18% vs COST's -53.39%.
GRNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GRNY and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer