GRNY vs. QGRW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GRNY (Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF) and QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - GRNY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tidal ETFs, while QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index. GRNY is actively managed, while QGRW is passively managed. Over the past year, GRNY returned 24.50% vs 27.41% for QGRW. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GRNY charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QGRW.

Performance

GRNY vs. QGRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GRNY having a 9.17% return and QGRW slightly higher at 9.19%.

GRNY

• 1D: -1.64%
• 1M: -0.15%
• YTD: 9.17%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 24.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QGRW

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: -1.97%
• YTD: 9.19%
• 6M: 7.93%
• 1Y: 27.41%
• 3Y*: 25.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GRNY vs. QGRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	9.17%	24.05%	-0.45%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	9.19%	19.20%	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between GRNY and QGRW is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024	0.90

The correlation between GRNY and QGRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GRNY vs. QGRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GRNY

GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 40
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 36
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 41

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 41
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 42
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GRNY vs. QGRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) and WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GRNY	QGRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.47	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.87	2.01	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.26	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	1.78	+0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.40	6.70	-0.30

GRNY vs. QGRW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GRNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the QGRW Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GRNY and QGRW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GRNY vs. QGRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GRNY drawdown since its inception was -24.18%, roughly equal to the maximum QGRW drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GRNY and QGRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GRNY	QGRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.18%	-24.40%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.63%	-15.44%	+3.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-24.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.63%	-6.66%	+4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.95%	-3.28%	-0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.84%	4.10%	-0.26%

Volatility

GRNY vs. QGRW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF (GRNY) is 5.45%, while WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a volatility of 8.12%. This indicates that GRNY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QGRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GRNY	QGRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	8.12%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.01%	15.20%	-2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.09%	18.73%	-0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.13%	21.29%	+1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.13%	21.29%	+1.84%

GRNY vs. QGRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GRNY has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QGRW's 0.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

GRNY vs. QGRW - Dividend Comparison

GRNY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots U.S. Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GRNY and QGRW in my portfolio?

GRNY and QGRW have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GRNY or QGRW?

QGRW has higher volatility (8.12%) compared to GRNY (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GRNY dropped -24.18% vs QGRW's -24.40%.

Which ETF is better, GRNY or QGRW?

On 1-year performance, QGRW leads with 27.41% vs 24.50% for GRNY. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, GRNY has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GRNY or QGRW?

Over the 1-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 27.41% return vs 24.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GRNY or QGRW?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GRNY or QGRW?

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for GRNY.

What is the main difference between GRNY and QGRW?

GRNY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while QGRW is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tidal ETFs and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for GRNY and 0.28% for QGRW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.