PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
JHML vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

JHML vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JHML (John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - JHML is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JHML returned 14.24%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHML charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

JHML vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHML achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JHML having a 14.24% annualized return and BNO not far behind at 13.60%.

JHML

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.79%
YTD
11.62%
6M
11.80%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
20.37%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
14.24%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHML vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF		11.62%15.91%19.84%21.16%-15.94%26.90%17.02%30.94%-6.45%21.52%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between JHML and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2015

0.21

The correlation between JHML and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with JHML:
JHML vs. SPYJHML vs. VOOJHML vs. FBGRXJHML vs. JHDVJHML vs. BDGSJHML vs. IVVJHML vs. ^GSPC
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

JHML vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
JHML
JHML Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JHML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHML Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHML Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
JHML Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHML Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHML vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

JHMLBNODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.23

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

2.73

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

5.17

-1.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.61

9.76

+5.85

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JHML vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHML Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHML and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

JHMLBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.23

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.69

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.37

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.14

+0.67

Drawdowns

JHML vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHML drawdown since its inception was -36.13%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHML and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

JHMLBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.13%

-87.06%

+50.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-17.87%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.20%

-23.75%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.47%

-33.70%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.13%

-75.18%

+39.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

-10.29%

+9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-40.17%

+35.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

9.45%

-7.74%

Volatility

JHML vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF (JHML) is 2.84%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that JHML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

JHMLBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

14.22%

-11.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

36.10%

-27.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

41.46%

-29.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.29%

35.38%

-19.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.76%

36.68%

-18.92%

JHML vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHML has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

JHML vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

JHML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JHML
John Hancock Multifactor Large Cap ETF		0.95%1.06%1.16%1.39%1.46%1.08%1.59%1.73%1.57%1.44%1.36%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

JHML and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to JHML (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHML dropped -36.13% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, JHML leads with 14.24% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, JHML is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, JHML has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JHML has performed better with a 14.24% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JHML is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

JHML has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

JHML is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. JHML tracks John Hancock Dimensional Large Cap Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for JHML and 0.90% for BNO.

JHML currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHML and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer