PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 35.51% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 12.80%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 17.65% annualized return.


IDMO

1D
0.87%
1M
2.67%
YTD
11.21%
6M
11.38%
1Y
28.80%
3Y*
25.90%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
12.80%

MTUM

1D
3.12%
1M
12.16%
YTD
35.51%
6M
35.00%
1Y
48.04%
3Y*
34.51%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
11.21%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
35.51%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and MTUM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.54

The correlation between IDMO and MTUM shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.71 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
MTUM

Financial Services

43.2%
5.0%

Industrials

21.3%
15.0%

Basic Materials

10.6%
2.3%

Utilities

7.9%
0.6%

Technology

6.2%
50.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
3.7%

Communication Services

2.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.3%

Energy

1.7%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
2.9%

Healthcare

1.1%
3.5%

Financial Services

IDMO
43.2%
MTUM
5.0%

Industrials

IDMO
21.3%
MTUM
15.0%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.6%
MTUM
2.3%

Utilities

IDMO
7.9%
MTUM
0.6%

Technology

IDMO
6.2%
MTUM
50.2%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
MTUM
3.7%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.1%
MTUM
5.1%

Real Estate

IDMO
1.8%
MTUM
1.3%

Energy

IDMO
1.7%
MTUM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.5%
MTUM
2.9%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.1%
MTUM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

4.18

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

16.07

-6.66

IDMO vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-34.08%

-5.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-11.54%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-20.99%

+8.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-32.28%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-34.08%

+2.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-6.20%

-3.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.00%

+0.03%

Volatility

IDMO vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is 7.48%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.07%. This indicates that IDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

11.07%

-3.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

18.99%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.88%

21.36%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.04%

21.04%

-3.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.18%

21.26%

-3.08%

IDMO vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDMO vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than MTUM's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.42%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.55%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and MTUM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.07%) compared to IDMO (7.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 17.65% vs 12.80% for IDMO. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 7.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 17.65% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.55% for MTUM.

IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer