JHMD vs. AVDV
JHMD (John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JHMD is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the John Hancock Dimensional Developed International Index, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. JHMD is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JHMD returned 8.79%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for AVDV. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JHMD charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
JHMD vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 8.43% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.89% return.
JHMD
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 8.43%
- 6M
- 11.81%
- 1Y
- 21.14%
- 3Y*
- 16.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- 44.33%
- 3Y*
- 28.33%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- —
JHMD vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 8.43% | 33.91% | 1.78% | 19.43% | -13.95% | 11.83% | 7.25% | 7.41% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.89% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHMD and AVDV is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between JHMD and AVDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
JHMD vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JHMD
AVDV
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Utilities
Communication Services
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
JHMD
AVDV
Industrials
JHMD
AVDV
Healthcare
JHMD
AVDV
Basic Materials
JHMD
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
JHMD
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
JHMD
AVDV
Technology
JHMD
AVDV
Utilities
JHMD
AVDV
Communication Services
JHMD
AVDV
Energy
JHMD
AVDV
Real Estate
JHMD
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHMD vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
JHMD
AVDV
JHMD vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHMD | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 2.87 | -1.42 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 3.80 | -1.71 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.52 | -0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.55 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.56 | 14.45 | -6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHMD | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 2.87 | -1.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.82 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.81 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
JHMD vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHMD | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.67% | -43.01% | +7.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.23% | -13.19% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.38% | -14.17% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.38% | -28.08% | -1.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -0.62% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.73% | -6.78% | +0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.24% | -0.24% |
Volatility
JHMD vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 5.19% compared to Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) at 4.93%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHMD | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.19% | 4.93% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.04% | 13.06% | -1.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.69% | 15.61% | -0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 17.30% | -1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.20% | 19.73% | -2.53% |
JHMD vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHMD vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than AVDV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.72% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JHMD John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF | 2.94% | 3.19% | 3.55% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 3.22% | 1.89% | 3.19% | 2.09% | 2.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHMD and AVDV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JHMD has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to AVDV (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHMD dropped -35.67% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 14.12% vs 8.79% for JHMD. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 14.12% return vs 8.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for JHMD.
JHMD has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.72% for AVDV.
JHMD is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Manulife and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for JHMD and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHMD and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer