PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGRTX vs. MGK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGRTX vs. MGK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FGRTX having a 10.85% return and MGK slightly higher at 11.27%. Over the past 10 years, FGRTX has underperformed MGK with an annualized return of 16.52%, while MGK has yielded a comparatively higher 19.37% annualized return.


FGRTX

1D
0.41%
1M
3.19%
YTD
10.85%
6M
13.28%
1Y
32.57%
3Y*
25.72%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
16.52%

MGK

1D
-0.30%
1M
8.29%
YTD
11.27%
6M
10.68%
1Y
32.46%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
16.84%
10Y*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRTX vs. MGK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
10.85%26.92%25.98%26.51%-8.98%26.29%12.96%31.07%-7.44%16.98%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
11.27%20.67%32.94%51.67%-33.59%28.58%41.01%37.38%-2.91%29.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FGRTX and MGK is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2007

0.87

The correlation between FGRTX and MGK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGRTX vs. MGK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGRTX
FGRTX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FGRTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGRTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGRTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FGRTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGRTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MGK
MGK Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
MGK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGK Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MGK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGK Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRTX vs. MGK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) and Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGRTXMGKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.81

2.02

+0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.83

2.71

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.35

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

2.00

+1.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.91

6.90

+10.01

FGRTX vs. MGK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the MGK Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRTX and MGK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGRTXMGKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.81

2.02

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

0.75

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.66

-0.18

Drawdowns

FGRTX vs. MGK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRTX drawdown since its inception was -56.17%, which is greater than MGK's maximum drawdown of -47.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRTX and MGK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGRTXMGKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.17%

-47.97%

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.99%

-16.85%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.51%

-23.36%

+4.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-36.01%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.18%

-36.01%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.30%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-7.47%

-1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

4.89%

-2.91%

Volatility

FGRTX vs. MGK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund (FGRTX) is 2.69%, while Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) has a volatility of 3.75%. This indicates that FGRTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MGK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGRTXMGKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

3.75%

-1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

12.32%

-3.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

16.20%

-4.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

22.63%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

21.88%

-3.76%

FGRTX vs. MGK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRTX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than MGK's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGRTX vs. MGK - Dividend Comparison

FGRTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than MGK's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGRTX
Fidelity Mega Cap Stock Fund
3.51%3.89%2.68%2.06%4.38%4.79%7.96%12.98%21.72%15.57%1.97%4.16%
MGK
Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF
0.31%0.35%0.43%0.50%0.70%0.41%0.65%0.85%1.12%1.23%1.53%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGRTX and MGK have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGK has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to FGRTX (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGRTX dropped -56.17% vs MGK's -47.97%.

FGRTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGRTX and MGK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer