PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHMD vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JHMD vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JHMD vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
2.02%33.91%1.78%19.43%-13.95%11.83%7.25%19.83%-14.54%25.02%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%19.13%-13.34%27.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHMD achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than CIL's 5.44% return.


JHMD

1D
3.12%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
2.02%
6M
7.48%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
15.08%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
10.80%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
16.16%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JHMD vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHMD has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JHMD vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHMD
JHMD Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
JHMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHMD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
JHMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHMD vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JHMDCILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

2.29

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.10

3.15

-1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.54

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

2.32

-0.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.45

15.10

-6.65

JHMD vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHMD and CIL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JHMDCILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

2.29

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.53

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Correlation

The correlation between JHMD and CIL is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

JHMD vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

JHMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.13%, more than CIL's 2.38% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHMD
John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF
3.13%3.19%3.55%3.01%2.85%3.22%1.89%3.19%2.09%2.27%0.00%0.00%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
2.38%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%

Drawdowns

JHMD vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHMD drawdown since its inception was -35.67%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHMD and CIL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JHMDCILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.67%

-36.27%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.23%

-9.66%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.38%

-29.89%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.77%

-0.58%

-7.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.80%

-6.66%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

1.73%

+1.16%

Volatility

JHMD vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Multifactor Developed International ETF (JHMD) has a higher volatility of 7.48% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that JHMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JHMDCILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.48%

0.00%

+7.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.77%

5.76%

+5.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.48%

13.30%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.67%

-0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

17.32%

-0.14%