JGRO vs. VOT

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while VOT is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Growth Index. JGRO is actively managed, while VOT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JGRO returned 18.05%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for VOT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JGRO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

JGRO vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than VOT's 5.36% return.

JGRO

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -5.05%
• 6M: 0.24%
• YTD: -0.18%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.28%

VOT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -4.14%
• 6M: 3.07%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 1Y: 2.10%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: 11.44%
• ALL TIME*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRO vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	-0.18%	14.71%	32.77%	37.74%	-10.43%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	5.36%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-10.30%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and VOT is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.85

The correlation between JGRO and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGRO vs. VOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JGRO	VOT
Technology	49.6%	34.0%
Communication Services	14.1%	3.0%
Industrials	10.4%	25.4%
Healthcare	7.7%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	11.1%
Financial Services	4.6%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	0.7%
Energy	1.6%	1.8%
Real Estate	0.2%	4.2%
Basic Materials	0.2%	1.6%
Utilities	0.1%	2.9%

Return for Risk

JGRO vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO

JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 17
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 16
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 17

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 12
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JGRO	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.12	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.63	0.29	+0.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.03	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.40	0.13	+0.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.16	0.39	+0.76

JGRO vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum VOT drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGRO	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-60.16%	+37.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	-15.96%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-21.77%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.90%	-4.30%	-2.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-9.91%	+5.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	5.38%	+0.25%

Volatility

JGRO vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.78%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGRO	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	4.78%	+2.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.93%	13.92%	+0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.44%	17.07%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.08%	21.55%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.08%	21.02%	-0.94%

JGRO vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGRO vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than VOT's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	0.16%	0.16%	0.10%	0.17%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGRO and VOT in my portfolio?

JGRO and VOT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGRO or VOT?

JGRO has higher volatility (7.13%) compared to VOT (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which ETF is better, JGRO or VOT?

On 3-year performance, JGRO leads with 18.05% vs 12.33% for VOT. On fees, VOT is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOT has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JGRO or VOT?

Over the 3-year period, JGRO has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 12.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JGRO or VOT?

VOT is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JGRO or VOT?

VOT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.16% for JGRO.

What is the main difference between JGRO and VOT?

JGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOT is Mid Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.05% for VOT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.