PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGRO vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JGRO vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JGRO vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
-8.00%14.71%32.77%37.74%-10.03%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.43%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.43% return.


JGRO

1D
1.02%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-8.96%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
10Y*

CCOR

1D
-0.09%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
0.52%
1Y
-1.24%
3Y*
-3.35%
5Y*
-0.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JGRO vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

JGRO vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO
JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGROCCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.71

-0.12

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.15

-0.10

+1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.99

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.97

-0.17

+1.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

-0.32

+3.32

JGRO vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGROCCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

-0.12

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.15

+0.67

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and CCOR is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

JGRO vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
0.17%0.16%0.10%0.17%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JGROCCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.70%

-22.99%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-9.17%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.49%

-17.30%

+4.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-7.08%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.30%

4.97%

+0.33%

Volatility

JGRO vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.13%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JGROCCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.70%

2.13%

+4.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.59%

5.44%

+7.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.47%

10.73%

+10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

11.13%

+8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

10.81%

+9.31%