JETS vs. SHPP
JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and SHPP (Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index while SHPP tracks the Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JETS returned 17.53%/yr vs 11.28%/yr for SHPP. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for SHPP.
Performance
JETS vs. SHPP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a 16.39% return, which is significantly lower than SHPP's 18.61% return.
JETS
- 1D
- 4.44%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 16.39%
- 1Y
- 42.46%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 4.40%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.06%
SHPP
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 2.02%
- 6M
- 12.95%
- YTD
- 18.61%
- 1Y
- 28.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $91.26M | $93.79M | $96.86M | |
| $4.61K | $5.97K | $3.27K |
JETS vs. SHPP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 16.39% | 11.64% | 33.21% | 11.42% | -12.77% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 18.61% | 12.88% | 0.76% | 20.86% | -4.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETS and SHPP is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between JETS and SHPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETS vs. SHPP — Risk / Return Rank
JETS
SHPP
JETS vs. SHPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETS | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 2.58 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | 10.06 | -5.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETS vs. SHPP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than SHPP's maximum drawdown of -21.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and SHPP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETS | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.92% | -21.57% | -43.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.13% | -11.06% | -13.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.21% | -18.84% | -16.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.04% | -0.52% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.93% | -4.16% | -20.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.52% | 2.82% | +6.70% |
Volatility
JETS vs. SHPP - Volatility Comparison
U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 10.19% compared to Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF (SHPP) at 2.79%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETS | SHPP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.19% | 2.79% | +7.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.90% | 12.51% | +14.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.05% | 15.26% | +17.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.57% | 17.32% | +15.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.23% | 17.32% | +16.91% |
JETS vs. SHPP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SHPP's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
JETS vs. SHPP - Dividend Comparison
JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than SHPP's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF | 0.71% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 0.04% | 1.24% | 0.09% | 1.57% | 0.58% | 0.17% |
SHPP Pacer Industrials and Logistics ETF | 1.68% | 1.80% | 2.41% | 2.89% | 1.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JETS and SHPP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JETS has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to SHPP (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs SHPP's -21.57%.
On 3-year performance, JETS leads with 17.53% vs 11.28% for SHPP. On fees, JETS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SHPP has been the lower-risk option at 2.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JETS has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 11.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JETS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for SHPP.
SHPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.71% for JETS.
JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while SHPP tracks Pacer Global Supply Chain Infrastructure Index - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: US Global and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.61% for SHPP.
SHPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETS and SHPP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer