JETS vs. IGF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and IGF (iShares Global Infrastructure ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds - JETS tracks the U.S. Global Jets Index while IGF tracks the S&P Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JETS returned 2.63%/yr vs 8.29%/yr for IGF. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGF.

Performance

JETS vs. IGF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than IGF's 8.05% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed IGF with an annualized return of 2.63%, while IGF has yielded a comparatively higher 8.29% annualized return.

JETS

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 9.48%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 2.63%

IGF

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 15.30%
• 3Y*: 15.91%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: 8.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. IGF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	-0.86%	11.64%	33.21%	11.42%	-19.01%	-5.13%	-28.93%	14.38%	-14.30%	18.66%
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	8.05%	21.31%	14.81%	6.14%	-1.26%	11.57%	-6.50%	25.82%	-9.95%	19.31%

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and IGF is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015	0.48

The correlation between JETS and IGF shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.49 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

JETS vs. IGF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JETS	IGF
Industrials	88.8%	38.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	-
Technology	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	20.1%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Utilities	-	41.1%

Return for Risk

JETS vs. IGF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS

JETS Risk / Return Rank: 21
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

IGF

IGF Risk / Return Rank: 44
IGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
IGF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
IGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
IGF Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. IGF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JETS	IGF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	1.47	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.10	-0.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.26	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	2.62	-1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	8.05	-5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JETS vs. IGF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the IGF Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and IGF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JETS	IGF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	1.47	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.73	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	0.49	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.24	-0.18

Drawdowns

JETS vs. IGF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than IGF's maximum drawdown of -58.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and IGF.

Drawdown Indicators

	JETS	IGF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-58.33%	-6.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.13%	-5.87%	-18.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.21%	-14.28%	-20.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.36%	-20.83%	-23.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.92%	-42.11%	-22.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.40%	-4.43%	-12.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.19%	-11.87%	-13.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.40%	1.90%	+7.50%

Volatility

JETS vs. IGF - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF) at 3.68%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JETS	IGF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	3.68%	+8.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.23%	8.59%	+15.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.61%	10.49%	+22.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.27%	13.99%	+18.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.18%	16.83%	+17.35%

JETS vs. IGF - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGF's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

JETS vs. IGF - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than IGF's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IGF iShares Global Infrastructure ETF	2.98%	3.23%	3.21%	3.36%	2.67%	2.42%	2.33%	3.27%	3.52%	2.95%	2.98%	3.25%
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	0.84%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	0.04%	1.24%	0.09%	1.57%	0.58%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JETS and IGF in my portfolio?

JETS and IGF have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JETS or IGF?

JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to IGF (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs IGF's -58.33%.

Which ETF is better, JETS or IGF?

On 10-year performance, IGF leads with 8.29% vs 2.63% for JETS. On fees, IGF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGF has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JETS or IGF?

Over the 10-year period, IGF has performed better with a 8.29% return vs 2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JETS or IGF?

IGF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for JETS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JETS or IGF?

IGF has the higher dividend yield at 2.98%, compared with 0.84% for JETS.

What is the main difference between JETS and IGF?

JETS tracks U.S. Global Jets Index, while IGF tracks S&P Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: US Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 0.39% for IGF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.