JETS vs. AMZA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA).

JETS and AMZA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JETS is a passively managed fund by US Global that tracks the performance of the U.S. Global Jets Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2015. AMZA is an actively managed fund by Virtus Investment Partners. It was launched on Oct 7, 2014.

Performance

JETS vs. AMZA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JETS vs. AMZA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	-9.98%	11.64%	33.21%	11.42%	-19.01%	-5.13%	-28.93%	14.38%	-14.30%	18.66%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	15.85%	0.17%	30.90%	23.35%	33.20%	51.22%	-49.25%	6.27%	-26.78%	-6.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -9.98% return, which is significantly lower than AMZA's 15.85% return. Over the past 10 years, JETS has underperformed AMZA with an annualized return of 0.59%, while AMZA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.

JETS

• 1D: 2.60%
• 1M: -8.77%
• YTD: -9.98%
• 6M: 3.86%
• 1Y: 24.64%
• 3Y*: 11.00%
• 5Y*: -1.06%
• 10Y*: 0.59%

AMZA

• 1D: -2.95%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 15.85%
• 6M: 16.57%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: 21.64%
• 5Y*: 23.08%
• 10Y*: 7.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. AMZA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZA's 2.01% expense ratio.

AMZA

InfraCap MLP ETF

JETS

U.S. Global Jets ETF

Return for Risk

JETS vs. AMZA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS

JETS Risk / Return Rank: 36
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 33

AMZA

AMZA Risk / Return Rank: 14
AMZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
AMZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AMZA Omega Ratio Rank: 14
AMZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
AMZA Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. AMZA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JETS	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	0.11	+0.55
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.22	0.29	+0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.04	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.94	0.15	+0.79
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.01	0.26	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JETS vs. AMZA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the AMZA Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and AMZA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JETS	AMZA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	0.11	+0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.89	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02	0.20	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	-0.04	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and AMZA is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

JETS vs. AMZA - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than AMZA's 8.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	0.92%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	0.04%	1.24%	0.09%	1.57%	0.58%	0.17%
AMZA InfraCap MLP ETF	8.12%	8.81%	7.29%	9.40%	7.65%	10.24%	22.13%	19.47%	34.46%	24.16%	18.36%	18.21%

Drawdowns

JETS vs. AMZA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, smaller than the maximum AMZA drawdown of -91.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and AMZA.

Drawdown Indicators

	JETS	AMZA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-91.46%	+26.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.13%	-17.90%	-6.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.70%	-25.15%	-21.55%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.92%	-86.84%	+21.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.00%	-14.86%	-10.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.25%	-45.52%	+20.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.52%	9.91%	-2.39%

Volatility

JETS vs. AMZA - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.45% compared to InfraCap MLP ETF (AMZA) at 6.43%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JETS	AMZA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.45%	6.43%	+5.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.28%	12.80%	+9.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.80%	23.42%	+14.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.82%	25.98%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.88%	37.46%	-3.58%